In re Armored Car Antitrust Litigation

441 F. Supp. 921
CourtUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
DecidedNovember 16, 1977
DocketNo. 318
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 441 F. Supp. 921 (In re Armored Car Antitrust Litigation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Armored Car Antitrust Litigation, 441 F. Supp. 921 (jpml 1977).

Opinion

TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN MINOR WISDOM, Chairman.

The Panel having ruled from the bench at the hearing on this matter that the actions in this litigation raise common questions of fact and that their transfer to the Northern District of Georgia under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 will best serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of the litigation,

IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1407, the actions listed on the attached Schedule A and pending in districts other than the Northern District of Georgia be, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Northern District of Georgia and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Richard C. Freeman for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions already pending there and listed on Schedule A.

SCHEDULE A

Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Civil Action Weston L. Sampson T/A Sampson Beverage Co. v. Brink’s Inc., et al. No. 77-2828

Sunshine Stores, Inc. v. Brink’s Inc., et al. Civil Action No. 77-2986

Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Brink’s Inc., et al. Civil Action No. 77-2642

Southern District of New York

Sunnydale Farms, Inc. v. Brink’s Inc., et al. Civil Action No. 77 Civ. 3517

State of Connecticut v. Brink’s Inc., et al. Civil Action No. 77 Civ. 3689

Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Brink’s Inc., et al. Civil Action No. 77 Civ. 3516

Hillman’s Inc., et al. v. Brink’s Inc., et al. Civil Action No. 77 Civ. 3153

Northern District of Illinois

The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Civil Action Co., et al. v. Brink’s Inc., et al. No. 77C3149

Northern District of Georgia

Food Fair Stores, Inc., et al. v. Civil Action Brink’s Inc., et al. No. C77-1246A

Raley’s Inc. v. Brink’s Inc., et al. Civil Action No. C77-1273A

LDC, Inc., et al. v. Brink’s Inc., et Civil Action al. No. C77-1294A

Biscayne Bank, et al. v. Brink’s Civil Action Inc., et al. No. C77-1363A

Liberty Coin Shop, Inc. v. Brink’s Civil Action Inc., et al. No. C77-1412A

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Armored Car Antitrust Litigation
472 F. Supp. 1357 (N.D. Georgia, 1979)
In Re Armored Car Antitrust Litigation
462 F. Supp. 394 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 1978)
Maryland v. Brink's, Inc.
462 F. Supp. 394 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
441 F. Supp. 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-armored-car-antitrust-litigation-jpml-1977.