In re Apportionment of the Ontonagon County Board of Supervisors — 1967
This text of 11 Mich. App. 348 (In re Apportionment of the Ontonagon County Board of Supervisors — 1967) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On Rehearing.
On the basis of the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Avery v. Midland County (1968), 390 US 474 (88 S Ct 1114, 20 L Ed 2d 45), the majority opinion of this Court in this case reported at 9 Mich App 349 is reversed and Const 1963, art 7, § 7, is declared unconstitutional under the Constitution of the United States as interpreted by Avery.
A review of the mandatory guidelines prescribed by PA 1966, No 261, § 4(a) through (h) (CL 1948, §46.404 [Stat Ann 1968 Cum Supp § 5.359(4)]), convinces us that they meet Federal standards of apportionment and that they are reasonable and proper. We so hold.
A review of the apportionment plan adopted and filed by the board of supervisors of Ontonagon county convinces us that it meets the requirements of PA 1966, No 261, and we so hold.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Mich. App. 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-apportionment-of-the-ontonagon-county-board-of-supervisors-1967-michctapp-1968.