In Re Application of Staley

California Court of Appeal

In Re Application of Staley

252 P. 752, 80 Cal. App. 589, 1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 953

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJanuary 7, 1927

DocketDocket No. 1466.

StatusPublished

This text of 252 P. 752 (In Re Application of Staley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Application of Staley, 252 P. 752, 80 Cal. App. 589, 1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 953 (Cal. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

[1] This application is not materially different from Criminal No. 1464, wherein C.A. Stice made a similar application on behalf of Craniczny. The additional matters set forth in the petition herein could not be proved without referring to the evidence received in the trial before the recorder's court. But such evidence may not be considered in this proceeding. (In reKaster, 52 Cal.App. 454 [198 P. 1029]; In re Kaster,185 Cal. 647 [198 P. 1031].) The application for a writ is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

[1] This application is not materially different from Criminal No. 1464, wherein C.A. Stice made a similar application on behalf of Craniczny. The additional matters set forth in the petition herein could not be proved without referring to the evidence received in the trial before the recorder's court. But such evidence may not be considered in this proceeding. (In reKaster, 52 Cal.App. 454 [198 P. 1029]; In re Kaster,185 Cal. 647 [198 P. 1031].) The application for a writ is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 P. 752, 80 Cal. App. 589, 1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-application-of-staley-calctapp-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack