Home/California Supreme Court/In Re Kaster

In Re Kaster

198 P. 1031, 185 Cal. 647, 1921 Cal. LEXIS 592
California Supreme Court·Decided May 11, 1921·No. Crim. No. 2377.·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

The petitioner heretofore sought his discharge on habeascorpus on account of the matters alleged in his petition filed herein, at the hands of the district court of appeal of the third appellate district. After a hearing that court on May 2, 1921, discharged the writ and remanded the petitioner. The court in so doing filed a written opinion. (In re Kaster onHabeas Corpus, No. 556, filed May 2, 1921 (Cal.App.),198 P. 1029.) [1] All points available to petitioner on habeas corpus are considered in that opinion, which, to our minds, correctly states the law in regard thereto.

The application for a writ is denied.

All the Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Kaster, 198 P. 1031, 185 Cal. 647, 1921 Cal. LEXIS 592 (Cal. 1921).

198 P. 1031 (In Re Kaster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Meisner
86 P.2d 124 (California Court of Appeal, 1939)
In Re Hartman
71 P.2d 921 (California Supreme Court, 1937)
In Re Application of Luna
257 P. 76 (California Supreme Court, 1927)
People v. Denault
253 P. 151 (California Court of Appeal, 1927)
In Re Application of Staley
252 P. 752 (California Court of Appeal, 1927)
In re Staley
80 Cal. App. 589 (California Court of Appeal, 1927)
In Re Hayward
216 P. 414 (California Court of Appeal, 1923)
In Re Braynard
199 P. 576 (California Court of Appeal, 1921)