In re Kaster

California Supreme Court

In re Kaster

185 Cal. 647

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedMay 11, 1921

DocketCrim. No. 2377

StatusPublished

This text of 185 Cal. 647 (In re Kaster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kaster, 185 Cal. 647 (Cal. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

The petitioner heretofore sought his discharge on habeas corpus on account of the matters alleged in his petition filed herein, at the hands of the district court of appeal of the third appellate district. After a hearing that court on May 2, 1921, discharged the writ and remanded the petitioner. The court in so doing filed a written opinion. (In re Kaster on Habeas Corpus, No. 556, filed May 2, 1921 (Cal. App.), 198 Pac. 1029.) [1] All points available to petitioner on habeas corpus are considered in that opinion, which, to our minds, correctly states the law in regard thereto.

The application for a writ is denied.

All the Justices concurred

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The petitioner heretofore sought his discharge on habeas corpus on account of the matters alleged in his petition filed herein, at the hands of the district court of appeal of the third appellate district. After a hearing that court on May 2, 1921, discharged the writ and remanded the petitioner. The court in so doing filed a written opinion. (In re Kaster on Habeas Corpus, No. 556, filed May 2, 1921 (Cal. App.), 198 Pac. 1029.) [1] All points available to petitioner on habeas corpus are considered in that opinion, which, to our minds, correctly states the law in regard thereto.

The application for a writ is denied.

All the Justices concurred

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 Cal. 647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kaster-cal-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack