In Re Androgel Antitrust Litigation
This text of 622 F. Supp. 2d 1382 (In Re Androgel Antitrust Litigation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER DEEMING MOTION MOOT
Before the Panel is a motion by plaintiffs Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc., and Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc. (d/b/a SAJ Distributors), seeking centralization, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, of the four actions on the attached schedule in the District of New Jersey for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. 1 This matter was considered by the Panel at its hearing session in Louisville, Kentucky, on May 28, 2009. The Panel has now been advised that the listed District of New Jersey action was transferred to the Northern District of Georgia, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404, in an order filed on June 3, 2009, thus depriving this litigation of its multidistrict character.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 is DEEMED MOOT.
SCHEDULE A
MDL No. 2060 — IN RE: ANDROGEL ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Northern District of Georgia
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:09-956
Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co., Inc. v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:09-957
Meijer, Inc., et al. v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al, C.A. No. 1:09-958
District of New Jersey
Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc., et al. v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al, C.A. No. 2:09-1507
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
622 F. Supp. 2d 1382, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49798, 2009 WL 1575539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-androgel-antitrust-litigation-jpml-2009.