In re Anderson

California Court of Appeal

In re Anderson

285 P.2d 690, 134 Cal. App. 2d 552, 1955 Cal. App. LEXIS 1798

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJuly 26, 1955

DocketCrim. No. 3168

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 285 P.2d 690 (In re Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Anderson, 285 P.2d 690, 134 Cal. App. 2d 552, 1955 Cal. App. LEXIS 1798 (Cal. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

The petitioner did not raise the question of a possible violation of section 1382 of the Penal Code in the trial court, nor did he move to dismiss in that court under that section. The point was not raised on the appeal (People v. Anderson, 126 Cal.App.2d 702 [272 P.2d 805]), and but imperfectly mentioned on the petition for hearing. The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. (348 U.S. 918 [75 S.Ct. 302, 99 L.Ed. 209].)

Under well settled principles, the right to a speedy trial may be waived. When a defendant does not object in the trial court, and fails to move to dismiss in that court, the point cannot be raised on appeal, and, of course, not on habeas corpus. (People v. Workman, 121 Cal.App.2d 533 [553]*553[263 P.2d 458] ; People v. Greene, 108 Cal.App.2d 136 [238 P.2d 616]; In re Alpine, 203 Cal. 731 [265 P. 947, 58 A.L.R. 1500].)

The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.

A petition for a rehearing was denied August 10, 1955.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI