In re Anderson

285 P.2d 690, 134 Cal. App. 2d 552, 1955 Cal. App. LEXIS 1798
California Court of Appeal·Decided July 26, 1955·No. Crim. No. 3168·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

THE COURT.

The petitioner did not raise the question of a possible violation of section 1382 of the Penal Code in the trial court, nor did he move to dismiss in that court under that section. The point was not raised on the appeal (People v. Anderson, 126 Cal.App.2d 702 [272 P.2d 805]), and but imperfectly mentioned on the petition for hearing. The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. (348 U.S. 918 [75 S.Ct. 302, 99 L.Ed. 209].)

Under well settled principles, the right to a speedy trial may be waived. When a defendant does not object in the trial court, and fails to move to dismiss in that court, the point cannot be raised on appeal, and, of course, not on habeas corpus. (People v. Workman, 121 Cal.App.2d 533 [553]*553[263 P.2d 458] ; People v. Greene, 108 Cal.App.2d 136 [238 P.2d 616]; In re Alpine, 203 Cal. 731 [265 P. 947, 58 A.L.R. 1500].)

The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.

A petition for a rehearing was denied August 10, 1955.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Anderson, 285 P.2d 690, 134 Cal. App. 2d 552, 1955 Cal. App. LEXIS 1798 (Cal. Ct. App. 1955).

285 P.2d 690 (In re Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Jones
510 P.2d 705 (California Supreme Court, 1973)
People v. White
222 Cal. App. 2d 774 (California Court of Appeal, 1963)
People v. Wilson
383 P.2d 452 (California Supreme Court, 1963)
People v. Boyd
203 Cal. App. 2d 348 (California Court of Appeal, 1962)
In Re Anderson
134 Cal. App. 2d 552 (California Court of Appeal, 1955)