In re American Motor Inns

49 A.D.2d 791, 372 N.Y.S.2d 753, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10838
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 25, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 A.D.2d 791 (In re American Motor Inns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re American Motor Inns, 49 A.D.2d 791, 372 N.Y.S.2d 753, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 23, 1974, which assessed appellant additional contributions as amounts due for the audit periods beginning January 1, 1970 and ending September 30, 1972. The board has found that musicians who performed services for the appellant pursuant to the terms of the standard "Form B” contract of the American Federation of Musicians were employees of the appellant. The clear language of the "Form B” contract constitutes the purchaser of the music as [792]*792the employer of the band (Matter of Basin Street [Lubin], 6 NY2d 276), and this provision is controlling unless there is "overwhelmingly clear” evidence that the contract provision reserving complete control to the purchaser was fiction (Matter of Savoy Ballroom Corp. [Lubin], 286 App Div 684, 691). Whether such a provision is a fiction in a given case is a factual issue and thus for the board’s determination if supported by substantial evidence (e.g. Matter of Pietrzak [Catherwood], 34 AD2d 864; Matter of Coral Inn [Cather-wood], 31 AD2d 771). The mere fact that the control given is not exercised is not alone dispositive (Matter of Pietrzak [Catherwood], supra), especially in the absence of proof that the exercise of such control was necessary (Matter of American Legion, Troop 1, Post No. 665[Catherwood], 10 AD2d 400, 402-403). On the instant record, we cannot say, as a matter of law, that the board could not properly find that the appellant was an employer and subject to contributions. Decision affirmed, with costs. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Main, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Mnorx, Inc.
60 A.D.2d 801 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 A.D.2d 791, 372 N.Y.S.2d 753, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-american-motor-inns-nyappdiv-1975.