In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

104 So. 3d 304, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 678, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2667, 2012 WL 5439265
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 8, 2012
DocketNo. SC12-187
StatusPublished

This text of 104 So. 3d 304 (In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 104 So. 3d 304, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 678, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2667, 2012 WL 5439265 (Fla. 2012).

Opinion

REVISED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Bar’s Criminal Procedure Rules Committee (Committee) has filed with the Court its triennial report of regular-cycle proposed rule amendments in accordance with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.140(b)(4). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const. The opinion dated October 18, 2012, is withdrawn and this revised opinion is substituted in its place.

Background

The Committee proposes amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.111 (Providing Counsel to Indigents); 3.125 (Notice to Appear); 3.140 (Indictments; Informations); 3.191 (Speedy Trial); 3.220 (Discovery); 3.410 (Jury Request to Review Evidence or for Additional Instructions); 3.590 (Time for and Method of Making Motions; Procedure; Custody Pending Hearing); 3.691 (Post-Trial Release); 3.800(a) (Correction, Reduction, and Modification of Sentences — Correction); and 3.851 (Collateral Relief After Death Sentence has been Imposed and Affirmed on Direct Appeal). In addition, the Committee proposes deletion of rule 3.170(l) (Pleas — Motion to Withdraw the Plea after Sentencing).

In accordance with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.140(b)(2), the Com[305]*305mittee published its proposals for comment prior to filing them here. Comments were received from one individual. Based upon the comment, the Committee withdrew two of the proposals that had been published and made additional amendments to two other rules. The revised proposals were published prior to the Committee filing the proposals with the Court. The Committee also submitted the proposals to the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar, which voted unanimously to approve them. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.140(b)(3). The Court published the proposals for comment after they were filed. A comment was received from the Florida Public Defender Association, to which the Committee responded.

After reviewing the proposals, comment, and response, and upon consideration of the oral argument heard in this case, we adopt the Committee’s proposals to amend rules 3.111, 3.125, 3.140, 3.191, 3.220, 3.410, 3.590, 3.691, and 3.800 as proposed. We also adopt the editorial amendments to rule 3.851 but decline to adopt the substantive amendments to rule 3.851 pertaining to the filing and sealing of expert reports. Finally, we sever the proposed amendments to rule 3.170 from this case, which will be considered with the proposed amendments to rule 3.170 pending in In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure — Postconviction Rules, Case No. SC11-1679.

Amendments

The more significant amendments are discussed below.

The notice to appear form in rule 3.125(i) is amended to comply with a prior amendment to rule 2.540(c) (Requests for Accommodations by Persons with Disabilities — Notice Requirement), requiring the inclusion of instructions for obtaining assistance to individuals with a disability who may need accommodations to participate in a court proceeding. See In re Amendments to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.540, 41 So.3d 881, 883-84 (Fla.2010). Rule 3.125(0 is amended to add the language required by rule 2.540(c).

The Court amends rule 3.140(c)(1) (Indictments; Informations — Caption, Commencement, Date, and Personal Statistics; Caption) to include a caption for use in municipal ordinance violation cases. The amendment is based upon the caption format set forth in rule 2.265(e) (Municipal Ordinance Violations — Style of Municipal Ordinance Cases).

Subdivision (h) of rule 3.191 (Speedy Trial; Notice of Expiration of Time for Speedy Trial; When Timely) is amended to clarify when a notice of expiration of time for speedy trial is timely filed and served. By striking the phrase “on or” from the portion of the rule providing “on or after the expiration of the periods of time for trial provided in this rule,” the rule clarifies that only after the expiration of time for speedy trial is a notification of such an event timely filed.

Subdivision (h)(1) of rule 3.220 (Discovery — Discovery Depositions; Generally) is amended to clarify that, upon application, either a pro se litigant or an attorney for either party may have the court or clerk issue subpoenas.

The amendments to rule 3.410 (Jury Request to Review Evidence or for Additional Instructions) address two separate issues. First, we amend rule 3.410 to permit the playback of digital recordings of trial testimony. Second, the rule is amended to allow the trial court, in its discretion, to respond in writing to a juror’s question rather than bringing the jury back into the courtroom in order for the trial judge to orally respond to the question.

Rule 3.800(a) (Correction, Reduction, and Modification of Sentences — Corree[306]*306tion) is amended to clarify that a defendant may seek correction of an allegedly erroneous sexual predator designation under the rule, but only when it is apparent from the face of the record that the defendant did not meet the criteria for designation as a sexual predator. This amendment is consistent with our decision in Saintelien v. State, 990 So.2d 494, 497 (Fla.2008).

The amendments to rule 3.851 are limited to editorial changes. We reject the Committee’s proposal to require that certain mental health expert reports in capital postconviction proceedings be filed and maintained' under seal in the trial court file. See In re Amendments to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420, 68 So.3d 228, 230 (Fla.2011) (rejecting a comment urging that Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420 be amended to provide for the automatic sealing of all mental health evaluations and reports filed in criminal cases).

Accordingly, the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure are hereby amended as set forth in the appendix to this opinion. New language is underscored; deleted language is struck through. The amendments shall become effective January 1, 2013, at 12:01 a.m.

It is so ordered.

POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

RULE 3.111. PROVIDING COUNSEL TO INDIGENTS

(a) [No change]

(b) Cases Applicable.

(1) [No change]

(B) [No change]

h(i) not discharge appointed counsel; or

&(ii) discharge appointed counsel and allow the defendant a reasonable time to obtain private counsel, or if the defendant elects to represent himself or herself, a reasonable time to prepare for trial.

(C) [No change]

(2) — (5) [No change]

(c)-(e) [No change]

Committee Notes

[No change]

RULE 3.125. NOTICE TO APPEAR

(a)-(k) [No Change]

(l) Form of Notice to Appear and Schedule of Witnesses and Evidence. The notice to appear and schedule of witnesses and evidence shall be in substantially the following form:

[307]*307[[Image here]]

[308]*308Name of Officer ID Agency [ ] Mandatory appearance in court,_ Location on.(date)., at_( )a.m. ( )p.m. [ ] You need not appear in court, but must comply with instructions on back.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Amendments to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.540
41 So. 3d 881 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2010)
Saintelien v. State
990 So. 2d 494 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)
In Re Amendments to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420
68 So. 3d 228 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 So. 3d 304, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 678, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2667, 2012 WL 5439265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-the-florida-rules-of-criminal-procedure-fla-2012.