In Re Amendments to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.540

41 So. 3d 881, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 267, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 802, 2010 WL 1994662
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 20, 2010
DocketSC09-1487
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 41 So. 3d 881 (In Re Amendments to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.540) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Amendments to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.540, 41 So. 3d 881, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 267, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 802, 2010 WL 1994662 (Fla. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Bar’s Rules of Judicial Administration Committee (Committee) has filed an out-of-cycle report proposing amendments to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.540, Notices to Persons with Disabilities. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

BACKGROUND

The Committee has proposed extensive amendments to rule 2.540 in order to better guide Florida courts and members of the public as to their rights and obligations under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990(ADA). See 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (2006). These amendments are also intended to promote uniformity in the provision of accommodations to individuals with disabilities. The Committee’s proposal was drafted with input and comments from various groups, including the Equal Opportunity Law Section of the Florida Bar (EOLS), the Office of the State Court Administrator (OSCA), and the Judicial Administration Committee of the Conference of Circuit Judges. Additionally, the Small Claims Rules Committee (SCRC) has independently suggested amendments to rule 2.540; the Committee indicated that it did not incorporate the SCRC’s suggestions into its own proposal, but it is not opposed to those changes.

The Court published the proposed amendments in the October 1, 2009, edi *882 tion of The Florida Bar News and received several comments. The Committee filed a response to the comments. After considering the proposal, the comments, and the Committee’s response, we adopt the amendments to rule 2.540 as proposed, with the exception of the specific revisions outlined below.

AMENDMENTS

Rule 2.540 provides for notice to persons with disabilities of their right to request accommodations. New subdivisions have been added governing the provision of such accommodations. Accordingly, the title of rule 2.540 is changed from “Notices to Persons with Disabilities” to “Requests for Accommodations by Persons with Disabilities” in order to reflect the broader content.

The rule is organized into six new subdivisions. Subdivision (a), Duties of Court, recognizes the court system’s obligation to provide accommodations to qualified persons with disabilities. This subdivision provides that a qualified individual with a disability will be provided, at the court’s expense, with accommodations, reasonable modifications to court rules and practices, and the provision of auxiliary aids or services. Subdivision (b), Definitions, incorporates the definitions from the ADA into rule 2.540.

Subdivision (c), Notice Requirement, encompasses the requirement under the ADA that public entities, including courts, notify persons with disabilities of their right to request accommodations. Subdivision (c)(1) incorporates text from the current rule, which requires that standard language informing individuals of their right to request disability accommodations be included in all notices of court proceedings and process compelling attendance in court. At the suggestion of the SCRC, we have added the requirement that the standard notice shall be printed in boldface, 14-point Times New Roman or Courier font. We also added the requirement that individuals who wish to request an accommodation must contact the appropriate court at least seven days before their scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving the notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than seven days. Subdivision (c)(2) of the rule contains new language that requires trial and appellate courts to post the procedures for requesting accommodations and the grievance procedures outlined in subdivision (f) throughout each court’s building and on its website.

Subdivision (d), Process for Requesting Accommodations, sets out the procedure for requesting disability accommodations. Subdivision (d)(1) provides the form in which such requests may be presented to the court. We have revised the Committee’s proposal to state that the request for accommodations must be made within the timeframe provided in subdivision (d)(3). Subdivision (d)(2) requires that the request for accommodations include a description of the accommodation sought; a statement of the impairment that necessitates the accommodation; and the duration that the accommodation is to be provided. Finally, subdivision (d)(3) sets forth the time frame in which requests for disability accommodations should be made. We have revised the Committee’s proposal so that the time provided is identical to the time frame given to request an accommodation under subdivision (c)(1), at least seven days before the scheduled court appearance or immediately upon receiving notification if the time before the scheduled court appearance is less than seven days.

Subdivision (e), Response to Accommodation Request, outlines the process through which a court will respond to a request for accommodations and either *883 grant, grant in part, or deny the request. Subdivision (e)(1) states that the court must consider, but is not limited by, the provisions of the ADA in reviewing a request for accommodations and determining the appropriate response. Subdivision (e)(2) describes the manner in which the court will respond to the accommodation request. The Committee’s original proposal required the court to respond to every request for disability accommodations in writing. Based upon the comments directed to this subdivision, as well as the Committee’s response to those comments, we have modified the Committee’s proposal. As revised, subdivision (e)(2) provides that if the request for accommodation is granted in its entirety, the court shall respond to the individual with a disability by any appropriate method. If the request is denied or granted only in part, or if an alternative accommodation is granted, the court must respond to the individual with a disability in writing. Lastly, subdivision (e)(3) provides that if a court determines that an individual is a qualified person with a disability and an accommodation is needed, the court may only deny the request if it determines that the requested accommodation would create an undue financial or administrative burden on the court or would fundamentally alter the nature of the service, program, or activity.

Finally, subdivision (f), Grievance Procedure, directs each judicial circuit and appellate court to establish and publish grievance procedures that allow for the resolution of complaints.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, we amend Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.540 as reflected in the appendix to this opinion. New language is indicated by underscoring; deletions are indicated by struck-through type. These amendments shall become effective immediately upon the release of this opinion.

The Court wishes to thank the Rules of Judicial Administration Committee, as well as the Equal Opportunity Law Section of the Bar, OSCA, the SCRC, and all the other commentors, for their valuable insight and assistance in addressing this important matter.

It is so ordered.

QUINCE, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

RULE 2.540. NOTICES — TO—REQUESTS FOR ACCOMMODATIONS BY PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 So. 3d 881, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 267, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 802, 2010 WL 1994662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-florida-rule-of-judicial-administration-2540-fla-2010.