In Re: Amendments to the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission Rules

252 So. 3d 733
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedAugust 30, 2018
DocketSC17-1362
StatusPublished

This text of 252 So. 3d 733 (In Re: Amendments to the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission Rules) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Amendments to the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission Rules, 252 So. 3d 733 (Fla. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission (Commission or JQC) has submitted for this Court's review recent amendments to the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission Rules (JQC Rules). Article V, section 12(a)(4) of the Florida Constitution authorizes this Court, with five justices concurring, to repeal the Commission's rules of procedure or any part thereof. The Court now exercises that authority and repeals the recent amendments to JQC Rules 6 and 20 that purport to authorize the Commission's investigative and hearing panels to designate filings with this Court confidential (confidentiality amendments). These amendments are inconsistent with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420 (Public Access to and Protection of Judicial Branch Records) and beyond the Commission's authority under the Florida Constitution.

In its July 24, 2017, notice of adoption, the Commission submitted for this Court's review a number of recent amendments to the JQC Rules, including the confidentiality amendments to rules 6 and 20. 1 This Court reviewed all the amendments and ordered the Commission to explain why the confidentiality amendments should not be repealed for inconsistency with rule 2.420. After receiving the Commission's response, this Court issued an order requesting clarification of the amendments. The Commission responded to this order and simultaneously provided a notice of adoption of revised confidentiality amendments to rules 6 and 20. Having considered the originally submitted amendments, the Commission's responses to this Court's orders, and the notice of adoption of revised amendments to rules 6 and 20, the Court repeals only the rule 6 and 20 confidentiality amendments.

Similar to the confidentiality amendments originally submitted in this case, 2 *734 the revised confidentiality amendments, which resulted in newly adopted JQC Rules 6( l ) and 20(b), authorize the Commission's investigative and hearing panels to designate filings with this Court, or portions of those filings, confidential. 3 According to the Commission, authorizing its panels to designate filings with this Court confidential is the Commission's "attempt to avoid disclosure of medical and personal information that is necessary to provide to [this] Court in cases involving disability or illness." 4 This Court does not question that the Commission's attempt to protect such sensitive medical and personal information from public view is made with good intentions. However, this Court must repeal the confidentiality amendments because neither the Commission nor its panels have authority to designate filings in this Court confidential under rule 2.420 or the Florida Constitution, and the Commission does not have authority to adopt a rule of procedure purporting to grant such authority.

Under article V, section 2(a) of the Florida Constitution, this Court has exclusive authority to "adopt rules for the practice and procedure in all courts," including this Court. Article V, section 12(a)(4) of the Florida Constitution authorizes the Commission to "adopt rules regulating its proceedings." However, neither that provision of the constitution 5 nor article I, section *735 24, which creates the public's right of access to judicial branch records and the limitations on that right, 6 authorizes the Commission to adopt rules allowing its panels to designate filings in this Court confidential.

Article I, section 24 of the Florida Constitution recognizes the rules of this Court that were in effect at the time of the adoption of that section as one source of limitation on the public's right of access to judicial branch records. 7 Therefore, in October 1992, in anticipation of the adoption of article I, section 24, this Court adopted Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420 to govern access to judicial branch records. 8

As relevant here, rule 2.420 provides the procedures for determining the confidentiality of court records, which includes all filings with this or any other state court. 9 Thus, the only filings in a JQC proceeding in this Court that can be designated and maintained as confidential are those determined to be confidential in accordance with the rule 2.420 procedures adopted by this Court. 10 A filing in this or any other state court is not confidential under rule 2.420 and cannot be otherwise "designated" confidential simply because it contains sensitive personal information. 11 And nothing in rule 2.420 excludes from its requirements filings in JQC proceedings in this Court or authorizes the Commission or its panels to designate such filings confidential and exempt from the public's constitutional right of access to those records.

Consistent with article V, section 12(a)(4) of the Florida Constitution, which makes proceedings against a judge before an investigative panel of the Commission confidential, rule 2.420(c)(3)(A) recognizes as confidential complaints alleging misconduct against judges until probable cause is found. However, after an investigative panel finds probable cause and files formal charges with the Clerk of this Court, any further proceedings before the Commission or this Court are public, and the records created in connection with or filed *736 in those proceedings are public unless they are recognized as confidential under rule 2.420(c).

This Court cannot agree with the Commission that rule 2.420(c)(8) authorizes the Commission to adopt the confidentiality amendments at issue here. Rule 2.420(c)(8) recognizes as confidential "[a]ll records presently deemed to be confidential by ... the rules of the Judicial Qualifications Commission." This provision was adopted in 1992, shortly before article I, section 24 of the Florida Constitution. 12 Section 24(d) preserves the effectiveness of rules of court exempting certain judicial branch records from public access as of the date this section was adopted, but it does not authorize new rules of court providing additional exemptions. On the contrary, section 24 (c) grants only the Legislature the power to create new exemptions. Consistent with these constitutional provisions, rule 2.420(c)(8) simply recognizes as confidential records that were confidential under any JQC rule that existed at the time rule 2.420 was adopted. 13 That rule does not authorize the Commission to adopt new rules of procedure addressing the confidentiality of its filings in this Court.

Accordingly, this Court repeals the amendments to JQC Rules 6 and 20 14

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The Florida Bar v. Tobkin
944 So. 2d 219 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)
In Re Amendments to Fla. Rules
608 So. 2d 472 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
In re Rules of the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission
364 So. 2d 471 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 So. 3d 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-the-florida-judicial-qualifications-commission-rules-fla-2018.