In Re Amendments to Fla. Rules

608 So. 2d 472, 1992 WL 311341
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 29, 1992
Docket80419, 80432
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 608 So. 2d 472 (In Re Amendments to Fla. Rules) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Amendments to Fla. Rules, 608 So. 2d 472, 1992 WL 311341 (Fla. 1992).

Opinion

608 So.2d 472 (1992)

In re AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION — PUBLIC ACCESS TO JUDICIAL RECORDS.
In re AMENDMENTS TO the RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR — PUBLIC RECORDS.

Nos. 80419, 80432.

Supreme Court of Florida.

October 29, 1992.

Gerald T. Wetherington, Chairman, Public Records Rules Drafting Committee, Alan T. Dimond, President, Patricia Ann Seitz, President-elect, Miami, John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, and John A. Boggs, Director, Lawyer Regulation, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Henry P. Trawick, Jr., Sarasota, Parker D. Thomson and Carol A. Licko of Thomson, Muraro, Razook & Hart, P.A., Miami, on behalf of The Florida Press Ass'n and Florida Society of Newspaper Editors.

Scott Foster, Gulf Breeze, Barry Richard of Greenberg, Trauring, Hoffman, Lipoff, Rosen & Quentel, P.A., Tallahassee, on behalf of The First Amendment Foundation.

Harvey M. Alper of Massey, Alper & Walden, P.A., Altamonte Spring, Ronald A. Bibace, Boca Raton, and Gregg D. Thomas and David S. Bralow of Holland & Knight, P.A., Tampa, on behalf of the Tribune Co., responding.

PER CURIAM.

The Public Records Rules Drafting Committee petitioned this Court to approve its proposed changes to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration. The Florida Bar also filed a petition with this Court submitting proposed amendments to the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. Because both proposals concern public access to records, we have consolidated the two cases. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 2(a) of the Florida Constitution.

The petitions were prompted by a proposed amendment to the Florida Constitution which will be on the ballot on the November 3, 1992 election. The proposed amendment essentially provides that all records of the judicial branch shall be public except those exempted by Court rule in effect on the date of the adoption of the amendment or those exempted by the legislature. The proposed amendments were published in the Florida Bar News on September 15, 1992, and several comments were filed in response. Based on our consideration of those comments, the proposed drafts, and oral arguments, we have adopted the appended amendments. The amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration are, in part, designed to clarify the rules on public access to the records of the judicial branch of government and its agencies. In light of Florida's strong policy in favor of open government,[1] the public is entitled to inspect the records of the judiciary, with certain exceptions.

The amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration are intended to reflect the judiciary's responsibility to perform both an administrative function and an adjudicatory function. In its administrative role, the judiciary is a governmental branch expending public funds and employing government personnel. Thus, records generated while courts are acting in an administrative capacity should be subject to the same standards that govern similar records *473 of other branches of government. The judiciary's adjudicatory responsibilities, however, require a modified policy toward public inspection. We find that the exceptions to the public access rule, listed in rule 2.051(a) of the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, are reasonable and necessary. They permit the judiciary to protect the rights of all citizens and perform its responsibilities. The rules we adopt do not close any judicial records not presently closed and in some instances open certain records which were formerly closed. Several individuals and groups requested the opening of even further judicial records, but the Court is unsure whether or not the opening of these additional records could have the effect of damaging or disrupting the judicial system. Because the proposed amendment prohibits the Court from later enacting a rule which would close any other records, the Court determined to deny such additional requests at this time. However, the Court is desirous of further input on these additional requests to assess their impact upon the integrity of our judicial system. This will permit further analysis of these requests and give the Court flexibility to open such additional records in the future as may be in the best interest of the public and the judicial system. We therefore adopt the amendments as set forth following this opinion as rule 2.051, Public Access to Judicial Records, Florida Rules of Judicial Administration.

The Florida Bar has proposed amendments to the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar that address public access to records in the possession of the bar. The amendments delineate certain records which the bar may clearly refuse to disclose, establishes confidentiality restrictions on advisory ethics opinions, and sets the procedures for maintaining and inspecting bar records. After a review of the bar's proposal and the comments received, we adopt the amendments to the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar as set forth following this opinion. We have added rules 1-14.1 and 7-5.1, and we have amended bylaw 2-9.4 and rules 10-8.1 and 15-4.2.

The amendments adopted herein shall be effective immediately upon the filing of this opinion.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

OVERTON, J., concurs specially with an opinion.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.

OVERTON, Justice, specially concurring.

I concur and write only to emphasize that, as I read these rules: (1) there is no change regarding the presumption of openness of court records, as set forth in Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc., 531 So.2d 113 (Fla. 1988); and (2) the judicial branch's administrative documents, including personnel and finance records, are being treated the same as similar records in the executive and legislative branches.

RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION

Rule 2.051. PUBLIC ACCESS TO JUDICIAL RECORDS

(a) Generally. Subject to the rulemaking power of the Florida Supreme Court provided by article V, section 2, Florida Constitution, the following rule shall govern public access to the records of the judicial branch of government and its agencies. The public shall have access to all records of the judicial branch of government and its agencies, except as provided below. The following records of the judicial branch and its agencies shall be confidential:

(1) trial and appellate court memoranda, drafts of opinions and orders, court conference records, notes, and other written materials of a similar nature prepared by judges or court staff acting on behalf of or at the direction of the court as part of the court's judicial decision-making process utilized in disposing of cases and controversies before Florida courts unless filed as a part of the court record;

*474 (2) memoranda or advisory opinions that relate to the administration of the court and that require confidentiality to protect a compelling interest which cannot be adequately protected by less restrictive measures. The degree of confidentiality imposed shall be no broader than necessary to protect the compelling court interest involved. The decision that confidentiality is required with respect to such administrative memorandum or written advisory opinion shall be made by the chief judge of the court involved, subject to review as provided below;

(3) complaints alleging misconduct against judges and other entities or individuals licensed or regulated by the courts until probable cause is established, unless otherwise provided;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Poole v. South Dade Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
139 So. 3d 436 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
In Re Amendments to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420
31 So. 3d 756 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2010)
Nucci v. Nucci
987 So. 2d 135 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Amendments to Fl. Rule of Jud. Admin. 2.420
954 So. 2d 16 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)
Med. Gen. Con., Inc. v. Chief Judge of Thir. Jud. Circuit
840 So. 2d 1008 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)
Smithwick v. TELEVISION 12
730 So. 2d 795 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Amend. to Fl. Family Law Rules of Proc.
723 So. 2d 208 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Florida Board of Bar Examiners
676 So. 2d 372 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Amendments to Rule of Jud. Admin. 2.051
651 So. 2d 1185 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
State v. P.D.A.
618 So. 2d 282 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
608 So. 2d 472, 1992 WL 311341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-fla-rules-fla-1992.