In Re Amendments to Fla. Rules Civ. Proc.

604 So. 2d 1110, 1992 WL 163953
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 16, 1992
Docket79613
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 604 So. 2d 1110 (In Re Amendments to Fla. Rules Civ. Proc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Amendments to Fla. Rules Civ. Proc., 604 So. 2d 1110, 1992 WL 163953 (Fla. 1992).

Opinion

604 So.2d 1110 (1992)

In re AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.

No. 79613.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 16, 1992.
Rehearing Denied September 30, 1992.

Benjamin H. Hill, III, President, Tampa, Alan T. Dimond, President-elect, Miami, and John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, Tallahassee, on behalf of The Florida Bar, and Clifford L. Somers, Chair, Civ. Procedure Rules Committee, Tampa, for petitioner.

Richard Yale Feder, Circuit Judge, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, Honorable John L. Phillips, Circuit Judge, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, Henry P. Trawick, Jr. of Trawick, Hammersley & Valentine, P.A., Sarasota, and Anthony C. Musto, Chair, Florida Rules of Judicial Admin. Committee, Coral Gables, responding.

PER CURIAM.

The Civil Procedure Rules Committee of The Florida Bar has submitted its quadrennial report of proposed changes in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. After full consideration of the recommendations of the Civil Rules Committee, the action of the Board of Governors, and the comments of interested persons, we amend the rules as set forth in the Appendix.[1] While we have adopted in large part the committee's recommendations, we have modified the proposed rules where we have deemed necessary. At this time we do not accept proposed rule 1.070(j) and proposed form 1.902(c) (service by mail); the proposed amendments to rules 1.490 (masters), 1.491 (child support enforcement), and 1.630 (extraordinary remedies); or the committee's proposal to move rules 1.700-1.830, Rules Common to Mediation and Arbitration, to the Rules of Judicial Administration. We delete rule 1.442 pursuant to this Court's opinion in Timmons v. Combs, No. 78,272, ___ So.2d ___ (Fla. July 9, 1992).

A brief explanation of additional substantive changes to the rules follows:

Subdivisions (b) and (f) of rule 1.080 are amended to allow service of pleadings and papers by facsimile (fax).

Subdivision (a) of rule 1.200 is amended to allow a party to set a case management conference in the same manner as a party may set a hearing on a motion. Subdivision (c) of the same rule is amended to remove the mandatory language and make the notice requirement for a case management conference the same as that for a hearing on a motion, i.e., reasonable notice.

Subdivision (b)(4)(D) of rule 1.310, Depositions Upon Oral Examination, is amended to clarify an ambiguity in whether the cost of the videotape copy is to be borne by the party requesting the videotaping or by the party requesting the copy. The party requesting the copy must bear the cost of that copy.

Rule 1.400, Publication of Deposition, is repealed to conform with the practice under rule 1.310(f)(3) of not filing depositions as a routine matter.

Subdivision (f) of rule 1.420, Dismissal of Actions, is amended to provide for automatic dissolution of lis pendens on claims that are settled even though the entire action may not have been dismissed.

Subdivision (g)(2) of rule 1.431, Trial Jury, is amended to minimize the inequity in numbers of peremptory challenges allowed in selecting alternate jurors in actions with multiple parties.

Subdivision (c) of rule 1.510, Summary Judgment, is amended to require timely service of opposing affidavits, whether by mail or by delivery, before the day of the hearing on a motion for summary judgment.

In rule 1.530(e), Motions for New Trial and Rehearing; Amendments to Judgments, the reference to assignments of error is eliminated to conform to amendments *1111 in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

In rule 1.540(b), Relief from Judgment, Decrees, or Orders, subdivision (b) is amended to remove the 1-year limitation for a motion based on fraud in financial affidavits used in marital cases.

In rule 1.611, the title is changed from Dissolution of Marriage (Divorce) to Marital and Post-Marital Proceedings. Subdivision (a) is reworded to explain when and how a financial affidavit must be filed.

Rule 1.612, Termination of Pregnancies of Unmarried Minors, is deleted because the related parental consent statute was declared unconstitutional in In re T.W., 551 So.2d 1186 (Fla. 1989).

In subdivision (b) of form 1.902, Summons, the title is amended to eliminate confusion by the sheriffs in effecting service.

Form 1.907(b), Garnishment, is added to effectuate section 77.0305, Florida Statutes (1991). It provides for a continuing writ of garnishment against salary or wages.

Form 1.931, Jurisdictional Statement — Law; Actions for Damages, is repealed because of the inability to ensure the form's correctness at any given time because of statutory changes in the courts' jurisdictional limits.

Subdivision (b) of form 1.988, Judgment After Default, is amended to clarify that post-judgment interest only applies to the total of the principal, court costs, and attorneys' fees, if applicable.

Standard Interrogatories, Form 7 (Marriage Dissolution — Interrogatories to Party), is extensively modified at the request of the Family Law Section of The Florida Bar.

The appended amended and new provisions of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, including new and amended forms, will become effective at midnight on January 1, 1993. Deletions are indicated by the use of struck-through type; new language is indicated by underscoring. Committee comments are included for explanation and guidance only and are not adopted as an official part of the rules.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J. and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

                           TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.010. SCOPE AND TITLE OF RULES
[AMENDED]
  [Editorial changes only]
1.030. NONVERIFICATION OF PLEADINGS
[NO CHANGE]
1.040. ONE FORM OF ACTION
[AMENDED]
  [Editorial changes only]
1.050. WHEN ACTION COMMENCED
[NO CHANGE]
1.060. TRANSFERS OF ACTIONS
[AMENDED]
  [Editorial changes only]
1.070. PROCESS [AMENDED]
1.080. SERVICE OF PLEADINGS AND
PAPERS [AMENDED]
1.090. TIME [AMENDED]
  [Editorial changes only]
1.100. PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS
[AMENDED]
1.110. GENERAL RULES OF PLEADING
[AMENDED]
  [Editorial changes only]
1.120. PLEADING SPECIAL MATTERS
[AMENDED]
  [Editorial changes only]
1.130. ATTACHING COPY OF CAUSE
OF ACTION AND EXHIBITS [AMENDED]
  [Editorial changes only]
1.140. DEFENSES [AMENDED]
  [Editorial changes only]
1.150. SHAM PLEADINGS [AMENDED]
  [Editorial changes only]

*1112
1.160. MOTIONS [NO CHANGE]
1.170. COUNTERCLAIMS AND CROSS CLAIMSCROSSCLAIMS [AMENDED]
  [Editorial changes only]
1.180. THIRD-PARTY PRACTICE [AMENDED]
  [Editorial changes only]
1.190. AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADINGS [AMENDED]
  [Editorial changes only]
1.200. PRETRIAL PROCEDURE [AMENDED]
1.210. PARTIES [AMENDED]
  [Editorial changes only]
1.220. CLASS ACTIONS [AMENDED]
  [Editorial changes only]
1.221. CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATIONS [AMENDED]
  [Editorial changes only]
1.222. MOBILE HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATIONS [AMENDED]
  [Editorial changes only]
1.230. INTERVENTIONS [AMENDED]
  [Editorial changes only]
1.240. INTERPLEADER [AMENDED]
  [Editorial changes only]
1.250. MISJOINDER AND NON-JOINDERNONJOINDER OF PARTIES [AMENDED]
  [Editorial changes only]
1.260. SURVIVOR; SUBSTITUTION OF PARTIES [AMENDED]
  [Editorial changes only]
1.270. CONSOLIDATION; SEPARATE TRIALS [AMENDED]
  [Editorial changes only]
1.280. GENERAL PROVISIONS GOVERNING DISCOVERY [AMENDED]
  [Editorial changes only]
1.290. DEPOSITIONS BEFORE ACTION OR PENDING APPEAL [AMENDED]
  [Editorial changes only]
1.300. 

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sarras v. Mills-Sarras
161 So. 3d 509 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Romero v. Romero
959 So. 2d 333 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Southeast Bank, NA v. Almeida
693 So. 2d 1015 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Natkow v. Natkow
696 So. 2d 315 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
Cerniglia v. Cerniglia
679 So. 2d 1160 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Beal v. City of Seattle
920 P.2d 1235 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1996)
Natkow v. Natkow
677 So. 2d 339 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Bemenderfer v. Bemenderfer
662 So. 2d 747 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Baker Protective Services v. FP INC.
659 So. 2d 1120 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Mendez-Perez v. Perez-Perez
656 So. 2d 458 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
Cerniglia v. Cerniglia
655 So. 2d 172 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Ghanbari v. Perrault
651 So. 2d 1257 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
In re Amendment to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.630(c)
639 So. 2d 22 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Sciandra v. First Union Nat. Bank
638 So. 2d 1009 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Utica Mutual Insurance Co. v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Co.
639 So. 2d 41 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Utica Mut. v. Pennsylvania Nat. Mut.
639 So. 2d 41 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Mendez-Perez v. Perez-Perez
632 So. 2d 1047 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
RD & G LEASING, INC. v. Stebnicki
626 So. 2d 1002 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Gordon v. Gordon
625 So. 2d 59 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
604 So. 2d 1110, 1992 WL 163953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-fla-rules-civ-proc-fla-1992.