In re Amendment to Florida Probate Rule—Part III (Guardianship)

551 So. 2d 452, 1989 WL 139493
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 29, 1989
DocketNo. 74786
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 551 So. 2d 452 (In re Amendment to Florida Probate Rule—Part III (Guardianship)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Amendment to Florida Probate Rule—Part III (Guardianship), 551 So. 2d 452, 1989 WL 139493 (Fla. 1989).

Opinion

Original Proceeding — Florida Rules of Probate and Guardianship Procedures.

PER CURIAM.

The 1989 legislature enacted a comprehensive revision to the Florida guardianship law which is scheduled to become effective October 1, 1989. Ch. 89-96, Laws of Fla. As a consequence, it is necessary that Part III of the Florida Probate Rules, which pertains exclusively to guardianship, be substantially amended. The Court would ordinarily amend these rules only after receiving the recommendations of the Florida Probate Rules Committee and the comments of any interested parties. However, in view of the shortness of time, the Florida Probate Rules Committee was asked for a recommendation as to whether this Court in the exercise of its rulemaking authority should adopt on a temporary emergency basis as rules of procedure all of the procedural aspects of the new Florida guardianship law.

Upon consideration, the Florida Probate Rules Committee has now recommended that the Court not enter a blanket order adopting all the procedural aspects of the new law on an emergency basis but rather that the committee should proceed in an orderly course to draft proposed rules designed to implement the substantive matters contained in the new legislation. As a basis for its recommendation, the committee stated:

The great majority of the Committee felt that the difficulties and uncertainties as well as inconsistencies which the various sub-committees found and were reported were such that for the Court to become involved by adopting them at this stage would probably create more problems than it would solve.
There are problems with the statute which are being addressed by various bar committees at this time which sho'uld result in corrective action by the 1990 regular session of the Legislature. In the meantime the Rules Committee will continue with the work of drafting proposed rules which would, insofar as possible, supply an appropriate procedural basis for implementation of the substantive statutory changes.

In the meantime, the Chief Justice of this Court appointed an ad hoc committee composed of knowledgeable judges and lawyers, including members of the State Courts Administrator’s Office, to recommend temporary rules of procedure which would implement the new guardianship law. The ad hoc committee1 has now made its recommendations for the amendment of the rules.

Upon consideration, the Court has determined to follow the advice of the Florida Probate Rules Committee to refrain from entering a blanket order adopting as rules of procedure all of the procedural aspects of the new Florida guardianship law. At the same time, the Court has determined to adopt the recommendations of the ad hoc committee as temporary emergency rules. These rules, which are hereinafter set forth, shall take the place of the existing rules under Part III2 and shall become effective on October 1, 1989. Most of these rules substantially track certain procedural portions of the new guardianship law. However, the Court wishes to point [453]*453out that rules 5.550(c), 5.590,3 and 5.800 contain material not specifically enumerated within the new law but which was deemed necessary to implement it. The committee notes are included for explanation and guidance only and are not adopted as an official part of the rules.

The Florida Probate Rules Committee is requested as a matter of priority to make recommendations to this Court concerning the adoption of permanent rules of procedure to implement the new guardianship law.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, CJ.,- and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, barkett, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

RULE 5.015 GENERAL DEFINITIONS

(b) Specific definitions. When used in these rules ...

(2)“formal notice” means notice under FPR 5.040(a) except as provided in FPR 5.550(c);

RULE 5.550 PETITION TO DETERMINE INCAPACITY

(a) Contents. The petition to determine incapacity shall be verified by the petitioner, who must be an adult resident of this state, and shall:

(1) state the name, age, and present address of the petitioner and the petitioner’s relationship to the alleged incapacitated person;

(2) state the name, age, county of residence, and present address of the alleged incapacitated person;

(3) allege that the petitioner believes the alleged incapacitated person to be incapacitated and specify the facts on which such belief is made and the names and addresses of all persons known to the petitioner who have knowledge of such facts through personal observation;

(4) state which of the rights enumerated in F.S. 744.3215 the alleged incapacitated person is incapable of exercising; and

(5)state whether plenary or limited guardianship is sought for the alleged incapacitated person.

(b) Petition for appointment of guardian. The petition to determine 'incapacity must be accompanied by a petition for appointment of a guardian and may be accompanied by a petition for appointment of an emergency temporary guardian.

(c) Notice.

(1) Contents of notice. Notice of the filing of a petition to determine incapacity must state the time and place of the hearing to inquire into the capacity of the alleged incapacitated person to exercise the rights enumerated in the petition, that an attorney will be appointed to represent him, and that if he is determined to be incapable of exercising certain rights, a guardian will be appointed to exercise those rights on his behalf.

(2) Formal notice. Formal notice for purposes of this rule means personal service by an elisor appointed by the court, who may be the court appointed counsel for the alleged incapacitated person. The notice must be read to the alleged incapacitated person. A return of service shall be filed by the person serving certifying that the notice and petition have been served and read to the alleged incapacitated person. No responsive pleading is required and no default may be entered for failure to file a responsive pleading. The allegations of the petition are deemed denied.

(3) Informal notice. Informal notice as defined in FPR 5.040(b) must also be given to counsel for the alleged incapacitated person, and upon all next of kin, wherever they are. The petition to determine incapacity must be served with the notice.

Committee Note

The committee realized that formal notice as defined in Rule 5.040(a)(1) requires the recipient of notice to file a responsive pleading within twenty days after the service of the notice. The committee believed that to impose such a requirement on the alleged incapacitated person would contra[454]*454vene the legislative intent of the 1989 revisions to Chapter 744. The committee observed that the time required for appointment of mandatory appointed counsel might render a'responsive pleading within twenty days impossible for the alleged incapacitated person. The committee concluded that, procedurally, notice upon the alleged incapacitated person should occur in the same manner as formal notice in Rule 5.040, but the required response under that rule should not be imposed upon the alleged incapacitated person.

RULE 5.560 PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN; NOTICE

(a) Contents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
551 So. 2d 452, 1989 WL 139493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendment-to-florida-probate-rulepart-iii-guardianship-fla-1989.