Amendments to the Florida Probate Rules

848 So. 2d 1069, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 495, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1063, 2003 WL 21402500
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 19, 2003
DocketNo. SC03-106
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 848 So. 2d 1069 (Amendments to the Florida Probate Rules) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amendments to the Florida Probate Rules, 848 So. 2d 1069, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 495, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1063, 2003 WL 21402500 (Fla. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Probate Rules Committee of the Florida Bar (rules committee) petitions this Court to consider amendments to the Florida Probate Rules. The amendments primarily follow statutory revisions to the Probate Code, other statutory changes, or implement procedures for addressing issues in the probate code. Specifically, the committee proposes amending Florida Probate Rules 5.122, 5.205, 5.240, 5.342, 5.385, 5.407, 5.430, 5.496, 5.552, 5.555, and 5.680. Moreover, the committee proposes amending only the committee notes in the following rules: 5.010, 5.020, 5.025, 5.030, 5.040, 5.041, 5.042, 5.050, 5.060, 5.100, 5.110, 5.120, 5.150, 5.170, 5.180, 5.200, 5.201, 5.210, 5.215, 5.230, 5.235, 5.241, 5.260, 5.270, 5.275, 5.320, 5.330, 5.340, 5.345, 5.346, 5.355, 5.360, 5.380, 5.386, 5.395, 5.400, 5.401, 5.405, 5.406, 5.420, 5.440, 5.460, 5.470, 5.475, 5.490, 5.510, 5.530, 5.541, 5.560, 5.590, 5.610, and 5.636. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

Pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.130(c), the proposed changes were submitted to the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar for its recommendation. After approval by the Board, this Court ordered publication of the proposed changes. No comments were filed.

We have reviewed the proposed amendments and adopt them as submitted and set forth in the appendix to this opinion. The new language is indicated by underscoring; deletions are indicated by strike-through type. The committee notes are offered for explanation only and are not adopted as an official part of the rules. For the amendments that are the result of the 2001 Probate Code changes (rules 5.122, 5.205, 5.240, 5.342, 5.385, 5.430, and 5.496), the amendments shall become effective immediately and shall be applicable to decedents dying after December 31, 2001. See ch. 2001-226, Laws of Fla. For all other amendments, the effective date shall be January 1, 2004, at 12:01 a.m.

It is so ordered.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

RULE 5.010. SCOPE

These rules govern the procedure in all probate and guardianship proceedings and shall be known as the Florida Probate Rules and may be cited as Fla. Prob. R. Part I applies to all proceedings. Part II applies to probate alone, Part III applies to guardianship alone, and Part IV applies to expedited judicial intervention concerning medical treatment procedures. The [1070]*1070Florida Rules of Civil Procedure apply only as provided herein.

Committee Notes

Rule History

1975 Revision: These rules shall govern the procedures to be followed in all matters pending on or commenced after January 1, 1976, including procedures for the enforcement of substantive rights that have vested before that date. See section 731.011, Florida Statutes.

1977 Revision: The changes in these rules shall take effect on July 1, 1977.

1988 Revision: In the opinion reported at 460 So.2d 906, the Florida Supreme Court directed the Probate and Guardianship Rules Committee to study the statutes and attempt to identify those portions of the Florida Probate Code, the Florida Guardianship Law, and other statutes that contained procedural provisions. When those procedural provisions were identified, the committee was charged to promulgate rules incorporating those procedures.

The committee has reviewed the statutes and has found a substantial measure of procedure that was contained only in the statutes for which there were no corresponding rules. The committee also determined that much of the procedure in the statutes already had a rule counterpart.

New rules added, or prior rules amended, in 1988 to add procedural matters previously found only in the statutes are rules 5.050, 5.122, 5.171, 5.180, 5.201, 5.235, 5.270, 5.275, 5.355, 5.360, 5.385, 5.386, 5.400, 5.440, 5.475, 5.490, and 5.510. With only one exception (see rule 5.050), the only portion of the statutes that has been reviewed in detail, and for which rules have been created, is the Florida Probate Code. Other portions of the statutes mentioned in the opinion cited above remain for the next cycle of this committee to review.

As the committee wrote rules to transfer the statutory procedure into these rules, an attempt was made to write the rule without changing the meaning of the statute. It was not possible or advisable to use the exact wording of the statute in some instances, and in those instances the committee rewrote the statutory language in the format used in the rules generally. Even under those circumstances, the committee attempted to transfer the entire procedural portion of the statute without changing its meaning. Where it was specifically intended in a few instances to add to existing statutory procedure, that fact is noted in the relevant committee note. The committee felt strongly that it would be detrimental to the orderly process of estate probate and related procedures if a rule specified a different procedure than was specified in the related statute, even though the statute must, under the Florida Constitution, yield to the rule when there is a conflict.

The committee, through the proper channels in The Florida Bar (initially, the Probate Law Committee of the Real Property, Probate and Trust Law Section), intends to ask the legislature to repeal those portions of the statutes that are procedural when there are similar rules already in place, or when similar new rules are added by this opinion. It is the opinion of the committee that continuing to maintain procedure in the statutes when there is a rule specifying that procedure is detrimental to the orderly process of the court and the public that it serves, especially when, over time, the statute and the rule may diverge.

Although the supreme court has adopted these recommended rules, it has not specifically determined that all of the provisions of the statutes that were procedural have now been adopted as a rule. This is [1071]*1071a continuing project for the committee and although these new rules and changes represent a substantial transition of procedure into the rules, the committee does not suggest that the transition is complete. The court is not precluded from examining any particular statute or rule in the context of a particular actual dispute.

1991 Revision: Rule revised to reflect addition of new Part IV dealing with expedited judicial intervention concerning medical treatment procedures.

1992 Revision: In 1989, the Florida Legislature enacted a comprehensive revision to Florida’s guardianship law. In response, the Florida Supreme Court appointed an ad hoc committee to recommend temporary rules of procedure for the new law. In an opinion at 551 So.2d 452 (Fla.1989), the court adopted the temporary rules recommended by the ad hoc committee, to replace Part III of the then-existing Florida Probate Rules, effective October 1, 1989. In its opinion, the court also directed the Florida Probate Rules Committee to review the new laws and, on a priority basis, to recommend permanent rules of procedure.

The committee reviewed the Florida Guardianship Law enacted in 1989, as well as revisions to the law enacted in 1990, and presented its rule recommendations to the court in 1991. The court, in an opinion at 584 So.2d 964, adopted the recommendations with minor exceptions, to be effective October 1,1991.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Margaret Blair Trust v. Blair
2016 OK CIV APP 47 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2016)
In re Cortigene
144 So. 3d 915 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2014)
State v. Pena
988 So. 2d 841 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2008)
Steadman v. DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVS.
901 So. 2d 915 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
848 So. 2d 1069, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 495, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1063, 2003 WL 21402500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amendments-to-the-florida-probate-rules-fla-2003.