In re A.M.
This text of 766 A.2d 1263 (In re A.M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
¶ 1 Appellant, A.M., a juvenile, appeals from the Order entered August 19,1999 in the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas. Appellant was arrested and charged with indecent assault on the basis of allegations that he engaged in indecent acts with his three-year-old sister. When Appellant appeared with his parents at the disposition hearing, his mother reported that Appellant’s attorney could not be present and asked for a continuance. This request was never entertained, and at the conclusion of the hearing, the court committed Appellant to Northwestern Intermediate Secured Unit.
¶ 2 Appellant raises five issues for our review. However, we need only consider whether the lower court erred in holding Appellant’s juvenile adjudication and disposition hearings in the absence of counsel and/or a waiver of the right to counsel.
¶ 3 Preliminarily, we note that the right to counsel is applicable to adjudication and disposition hearings. 42 Pa. C.S.A. § 6337; In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 36, 87 S.Ct. 1428, 18 L.Ed.2d 527 (1967). An admission, the juvenile equivalent of a guilty plea, is a critical stage at which a respondent must be afforded the right to counsel. Commonwealth v. Sheehan, 446 Pa. 35, 285 A.2d 465, 469-70 (1971). Moreover, counsel must be provided for a child unless his parent, guardian or custodian is present in court and affirmatively waives his right to representation. Gault. Pennsylvania has codified this principle in the Juvenile Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 6337, which states in relevant part:
[A] party is entitled to representation by counsel at all stages of any proceedings under [the Juvenile Act] and if he is without financial resources or otherwise unable to employ counsel, to have the court provide counsel for him. If a party appears without counsel the court shall ascertain whether he knows of his right thereto and to be provided with counsel by the court if applicable.
42 Pa.C.S.A § 6337 (emphasis added).
¶ 4 Further, when a respondent appears without counsel at any stage of a delinquency proceeding, the court has both a constitutional and a statutory duty to inform the child of his right to counsel, and his right to have court appointed counsel if he cannot afford representation. In re Gault, supra; Sec. 6337.
¶ 5 As the record demonstrates, the court failed to comply with these mandates at both Appellant’s adjudication and disposition hearings.1 Because the Common[1265]*1265wealth concedes that Appellant was unfairly denied counsel at his hearings, we need not address Appellant’s remaining claims.
¶ 6 Therefore, we vacate the Order of adjudication and remand this case for further proceedings.
¶ 7 Order vacated; case remanded for further proceedings; jurisdiction relinquished.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
766 A.2d 1263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-am-pasuperct-2001.