In Re Advisory Opinion to Governor

114 So. 850, 94 Fla. 967, 1927 Fla. LEXIS 884
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 23, 1927·Published·Cited by 41 cases

Opinion

*968 STATE OF FLORIDA,

EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT,

Tallahassee, Florida, November 4th, 1927.

TO THE HONORABLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA:

At the 1927 Session of the Florida Legislature, certain changes were made in the laws providing funds for the State Road Department subsequent to the adoption of the budget of such Department outlining its expenditures for the ensuing year, and in order to enable the State Road Department to meet the contingency of a temporary shortage of funds with which to execute its budget and contracts based thereon, the Legislature at the 1927 session enacted the following entitled law:

“An Act to authorize and empower the State Road Department of the State of Florida to Borrow Money at a rate of interest not to exceed Six Per Centum Per Annum Under Certain Circumstances and to provide the manner in which such money shall be repaid.” Approved June 2, 1927.

By the terms of this Act, it is provided that whenever the resources of the State Road Department in any given year will prove insufficient to meet the obligations incurred by the said Department in carrying out its budget of maintenance and construction for such year, that the said Department by and with the consent of the Governor is authorized to borrow money at the rate of interest limited in said Act, for the purpose of meeting such obligations and carrying on the work of the Department for *969 the remainder of the said budget year, the amount authorized to be borrowed in any one year being limited by an amount estimated by the Department as its resources for the year and restricted to an amount not in excess of twenty per cent of such estimated resources for such year, it being also expressly provided that said sums borrowed shall be paid in full before the Department, shall be authorized to borrow on the estimate for any succeeding year.

By Section 2 of this Act, it is provided that all payments of principal and interest shall be by warrant drawn by the Comptroller on the State Treasurer in the manner provided in Section 1194 of the Revised General Statutes of Florida.

Pursuant to this Act, and based upon the proceedings of the State Road Department, certified copies of which are transmitted to you with this communication, on October 3rd, 1927,1 consented to the borrowing by said State Road Department of the sum of two million dollars, or so much thereof as said Department deemed necessary to meet the emergency recited in the proceedings which lead up to my approval of the same, said loan to be for a period not exceeding ninety days, with such extension or extensions as may be found necessary to meet the exigencies of the occasion, and said loan to be at a rate of interest not to exceed six per centum per annum.

Acting by authority of the proceedings above mentioned, and of the said Statute (Chapter 12,297, Act of 1927), the State Road Department has negotiated with the Capital City Bank of Tallahassee, Florida, to make to said Department, a portion of the loan so authorized as aforesaid, and to evidence the same, said State Road Department has given to said bank its non-negotable written promise to repay the amount borrowed with interest on or before ninety days after date.

*970 Adequate appropriations were made at the 1927 session of the Legislature to enable the State Road Department to repay all of the money so proposed to be borrowed under authority of the above mentioned proceedings, but the moneys so appropriated have not yet been collected in full, although same are in immediate prospect of being collected on or about the date of the maturity of the proposed loan.

It therefore appears that all moneys thus proposed to be borrowed on short term loans, by said State Road Department, under the Act aforesaid, are fully covered by existing appropriations made for the next ensuing two fiscal years, by the General Appropriation Act passed by the Legislature of 1927, but that owing to the fact that the money to meet these appropriations is temporarily not available and will not be available until collected in the course of collection of anticipated current revenues, provision for raising which has been made by taxation provided by the Legislature.

The Attorney General of the State of Florida has approved the validity of the above mentioned Chapter 12,297, Acts of 1927, authorizing the above mentioned loan, as well as proceedings taken by the Department and by me as Governor, under said Act, said Attorney General stating that he based his approval of same upon consideration of the fact that funds to meet the repayment of the moneys borrowed must be considered in esse for the payment of the notes made and proposed to be made by the State Road Department to carry out said loan, provision having already been made in existing laws for the levy and collection of gasoline and other taxes for the benefit of the State Road Department sufficient to repay the amounts borrowed out of existing appropriations and contemplated *971 revenues during the next two years. State ex rel, Rankin, Atty. Gen. v. State Board, 197, Pac. 988.

However, Section 6 of Article IX of the Constitution of the State of Florida provides as follows:

“Section 6. The Legislature shall have power to provide for issuing State bonds only for the purpose of repelling invasion or suppressing insurrection, or for the purpose of redeeming or refunding bonds already issued, at a lower rate of interest.”

And Section 24 of Article IV of the Constitution provides :

“Section 24. The Treasurer shall receive and keep all funds, bonds, and other securities, in such manner as may be prescribed by law, and shall disburse no funds, nor issue bonds, or other securities, except upon the order of the Comptroller countersigned by the Governor, in such manner as shall be prescribed by law.”

I now have before me an order of the Comptroller drawn upon the State Treasurer in the manner provided in Section 1194 of the Revised General Statutes of Florida, for the payment under Section 2 of said Chapter 12,297, Acts of 1927, of the amount of interest due the Capital City Bank on a loan made by it to the State Road Department under the term of said Act and the proceedings herein-before referred to and I therefore request, by authority of the power vested in me as Governor of the State of Florida by Section 13 of Article IV of the Constitution of the State of Florida, that you render to me your opinion in writing as provided in said last mentioned provision of the Constitution, as to whether or not it is my executive duty as Governor of the State of Florida to countersign said warrant so drawn by the Comptroller on the Treasurer, in view of the provisions of Section 6 of Article IX of the Constitution of the State of Florida, which pro *972

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Advisory Opinion to Governor, 114 So. 850, 94 Fla. 967, 1927 Fla. LEXIS 884 (Fla. 1927).

114 So. 850 (In Re Advisory Opinion to Governor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Parker v. State
992 So. 2d 171 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)
State v. Family Bank of Hallandale
623 So. 2d 474 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
State v. City of Panama City Beach
529 So. 2d 250 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports, 1984
Hollywood, Inc. v. Broward County
90 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)
Jones v. Brown
82 So. 2d 889 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)
Thomas v. State Ex Rel. Cobb
58 So. 2d 173 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1952)
State v. Florida State Improvement Commission
34 So. 2d 443 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1948)
State Ex Rel. Harrington v. City of Pompano
188 So. 610 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
State Ex Rel. Harrell v. Cone
177 So. 854 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
Williams v. the Town of Dunnellon
169 So. 631 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Kathleen Citrus Land Co. v. City of Lakeland
169 So. 356 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Brash v. State Tuberculosis Board
167 So. 827 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
State Ex Rel. Read, Ins. v. Midwest Mutual Burial Ass'n
1936 OK 220 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1936)
Boykin v. Town of River Junction
164 So. 558 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Nelson Bros.
87 S.W.2d 394 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1935)
State Ex Rel. Kurz v. Lee
163 So. 859 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
State v. City of St. Petersburg
157 So. 641 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
In re Advisory Opinion to Governor Sholtz
154 So. 154 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)