In re Advanced Electronics, Inc.

99 B.R. 245, 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 579, 1989 WL 39745
CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 18, 1989
DocketBankruptcy No. 5-89-00221
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 B.R. 245 (In re Advanced Electronics, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Advanced Electronics, Inc., 99 B.R. 245, 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 579, 1989 WL 39745 (M.D. Pa. 1989).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

THOMAS C. GIBBONS, Bankruptcy Judge:

In this petition filed under 11 U.S.C. § 303(b)(1), Star Micronics America, Inc., Supra Corporation, Okidata, Division of Oki America, Inc., filed an Involuntary Chapter 11 petition against Advanced Electronics, Inc. as of March 17, 1989. Additionally, petitioners on the same date have filed a Motion for the Appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee.

Section 303(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 303(b)(1), provides:

(b) An involuntary case against a person is commenced by the filing with the Bankruptcy Court of a petition under Chapter 7 or 11 of this Title
(1) by three or more entities, each of which is either a holder of a claim against such person that is not contingent as to liability or the subject of a bona fide dispute, or an indenture trustee representing such a holder

On or about March 21, 1989, the President of Advanced Electronics, Inc., and a 50% shareholder, Mark W. Reeder, filed a Motion to Appoint a Trustee. The said Mark [246]*246W. Reeder also filed an answer admitting material averments of the aforesaid Involuntary Chapter 11 petition.

On March 28, 1989 an expedited hearing was set on the Involuntary Petition and the Appointment of a Trustee for April 5,1989.

On March 31, 1989, Compro Distributing, Inc. and Philip A. Courtright filed an answer denying the material allegations of the Involuntary Petition.

Petitioning creditors, Star Micronics America, Inc., Supra Corporation and Oki-data, Division of Oki America, Inc., prior to the hearing on April 10, 1989, moved to strike the answers filed by Philip A. Court-right and Mark W. Reeder as being in violation of the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law and not representing an authorized corporate response. Section 1319 of the Business Corporation Law reads as follows:

§ 1319. Insolvency or bankruptcy.
Whenever a business corporation shall be insolvent or in financial difficulty, the board of directors may, by resolution and without the consent of the shareholders, authorize and designate the officers of the corporation to execute a deed of assignment for the benefit of creditors, or file a voluntary petition in bankruptcy, or file an answer consenting to the appointment of a receiver upon a bill in equity filed by creditors or shareholders, or, if insolvent, file an answer to an involuntary petition in bankruptcy admitting the insolvency of the corporation and its willingness to be adjudged a bankrupt on that ground.

Said motions to strike were immediately granted and in answer to questions put to counsel representing the individual shareholders it was clear that neither was properly authorized by the alleged debtor to represent it in the proceeding about to start. In view of this, said counsel were advised that they lacked standing to participate in the proceeding in any way. This position was slightly modified to allow either or both lawyers to question witnesses on matters of jurisdiction. Neither one availed himself of the opportunity.

Prior to the commencement of this hearing, the Court considered the possible application of Bankruptcy Rule 1013(b).

Rule 1013. Hearing and Disposition of Petition in Involuntary Cases.

(a) Contested Petition. The court shall determine the issues of a contested petition at the earliest practicable time and forthwith enter an order for relief, dismiss the petition, or enter other appropriate orders.

(b) Default. If no pleading or other defense to a petition is filed within the time provided by Rule 1011, the court, on the next day, or as soon thereafter as praticable, shall enter an order for relief prayed for in the petition.

Because of the fact that answers were filed in behalf of individual shareholders, however, the Court was somewhat deterred from doing so. Similarly, due to the ambiguity created by the consideration of Bankruptcy Rule 1018 which deals with contested Involuntary Petitions and omits Bankruptcy Rule 7055, which deals with the subject of default, in its first paragraph it was decided out of abundance of caution not to consider the entry of an order for relief by default.

From the testimonial and documentary evidence offered by the petitioning creditors, we make the following Findings of Fact. These are identical in all respects by those proposed by counsel for the petitioning creditors and adopted as findings by the Court:

1. Star Micronics America, Inc., of 200 Park Avenue, New York, New York, 10166, holds a claim against Advanced Electronics, Inc., in the amount of $433,649.11; $81,047.60 only of the claim is disputed by Advanced Electronics, Inc. The balance of $352,601.51 is not disputed. The claim of Star Micronics, Inc. against Advanced Electronics, Inc. is not contingent in any way.

2. Supra Corporation, of 1133 Commercial Way, Albany, Oregon, 97321, holds a claim against Advanced Electronics, Inc., in the amount of $14,270.15. The Supra Corporation claim is not contingent or disputed in any.

[247]*2473. Okidata, Division of Oki American, Inc., of 532 Fellowship Road, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey, 08054, holds a claim against Advanced Electronics, Inc., in the amount of $35,380.58. The Okidata, Division of Oki American, Inc. claim is not contingent or disputed in any way.

4. Advanced Electronics, Inc., is a Pennsylvania corporation having an office and principal place of business at 3500 West Fourth Street, Williamsport, Pennsylvania, 17701.

5. Advanced Electronics, Inc., principal place of business and principal assets have been in Williamsport, Lycoming county for 180 days preceding the filing of the Involuntary Petition.

6. Advanced Electronics, Inc., is a person against whom an Order for Relief may be entered under Title 11 of the U.S.Code.

7. On March 13, 1989, President Judge Thomas C. Raup, entered an Order authorizing a writ of seizure under an action of replevin brought by Chrysler First Wholesale Credit, Inc. that authorized seizure of Debtor’s inventory on an outstanding past due indebtedness in excess of $534,000.00. Said action is docketed to Lycoming County 89-00461.

8. The writ of seizure was issued under a replevin action brought by Chrysler First Wholesale Credit, Inc. on March 10, 1989, based on defaults of Advanced Electronics, Inc., including:

(a) the withdraw on March 8,1989 of the guarantees of Philip A. Courtright and Lyco delivered to Chrysler First Wholesale Credit, Inc. These guarantees were previously given as collateral security for Advanced Electronics, Inc. financing, by Computer Marketing and Consultants, Inc. and Philip A. Courtright;

(b) the non-clearance and non-payment of an Advanced Electronics, Inc. check in the amount of $220,000.00 given by Advanced Electronics, Inc. on its obligations to Chrysler First Wholesale Credit, Inc. under which said check was returned NSF; and

(c) the issuance of a court opinion by President Judge Thomas C. Raup on March 3, 1989 under which purported meetings of shareholders and board of directors of Advanced Electronics, Inc. held after August 10, 1983 were held to be a nullity.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Advanced Electronics, Inc.
107 B.R. 503 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 B.R. 245, 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 579, 1989 WL 39745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-advanced-electronics-inc-pamd-1989.