In re Adoption of Jimenez
This text of 2000 Ohio 42 (In re Adoption of Jimenez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 90 Ohio St.3d 1214.]
IN RE ADOPTION OF JIMENEZ. [Cite as In re Adoption of Jimenez, 2000-Ohio-42.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 99-1993—Submitted September 12, 2000—Decided September 20, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 17484. __________________ Dan D. Weiner, for appellee Heather Jimenez. Lane, Alton & Horst, Charles K. Milless and Corinne N. Ryan; Susan Garner Eisenman; Holzfaster, Cecil, McKnight & Mues and Robert L. Mues, for appellants William and Yvonne Arnold. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. DOUGLAS and PFEIFER, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2000 Ohio 42, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-adoption-of-jimenez-ohio-2000.