In re Administrative Order Number 10

347 Ark. 1064, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 658
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJanuary 31, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 347 Ark. 1064 (In re Administrative Order Number 10) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Administrative Order Number 10, 347 Ark. 1064, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 658 (Ark. 2002).

Opinion

P ER CURIAM.

On February 5, 1990, this Court first adopted guidelines for child support in response to P.L. 100-485 and Ark. Code Ann. § 9-12-312(a). Effective October, 1989, P.L. 100-485 required the following: that all states adopt guidelines for setting child support; that it be a rebuttable presumption that the amount of support calculated from the child-support chart is correct; and that each state’s guidelines be reviewed and revised, as necessary, at least every four years. In response to the federal law, the Arkansas General Assembly enacted Ark. Code Ann. § 9-12-312, which included the federal provisions and authorized the Arkansas Supreme Court to develop guidelines based on recommendations submitted to the Court by a committee appointed by the Chief Justice.

The Committee on Child Support initially made recommendations to the Court which formed the substance of the 1990 Per Curiam Order. On May 13, 1991, pursuant to the Committee’s recommendations, the Court issued a new Per Curiam Order which supplemented the original. Then, in compliance with the four-year requirement of P.L. 100-485, the Committee submitted recommendations to the Court in October, 1993, and the Court issued a Per Curiam Order on October 23, 1993, adopting the guidelines which subsequently were published in the Court Rules volume of the Arkansas Code Annotated.

On September 25, 1997, again pursuant to the four-year requirement of P.L. 100-485, the Court issued a Per Curiam Order, adopting recommendations of the Child Support Committee. In addition, the Court adopted and published Administrative Order Number 10 — Arkansas Child Support Guidelines, effective October 1, 1997. The Administrative Order incorporated by reference the weekly and monthly family-support charts and the Affidavit of Financial Means. The Court republished Administrative Order Number 10 with a Per Curiam Order of January 22, 1998, making minor corrections to the child-support charts and to the Affidavit of Financial Means.

In the ensuing four years, the Committee has continued to study the existing guidelines, pursuant to federal and state law, and once again has submitted its recommendations to the Court. Having carefully considered these most recent recommendations, the Court adopts and publishes Administrative Order Number 10 — Arkansas Child Support Guidelines, effective February 11, 2002. This Administrative Order includes and incorporates by reference the revised weekly and monthly family-support charts and the revised Affidavit of Financial Means which are attached to Administrative Order No. 10.

The Court thanks the Committee for its service, and as it has done in the past, directs the Committee and the Chief Justice, as its liaison, to continue its charge pursuant to law and the rules of this Court.

Glaze and Corbin, JJ., dissent.
* * *
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NUMBER 10 — CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES

SECTION I. AUTHORITY AND SCOPE.

Pursuant to Act 948 of 1989, as amended, codified at Ark. Code Ann. § 9-12-312(a) and the Family Support Act of 1988, Pub. L. No. 100-485 (1988), the Court adopts and publishes Administrative Order Number 10 — Child Support Guidelines. This Administrative Order includes and incorporates by reference the attached weekly and monthly family-support charts and the attached Affidavit of Financial Means.

It is a rebuttable presumption that the amount of child support calculated pursuant to the most recent revision of the Family Support Chart is the amount of child support to be awarded in any judicial proceeding for divorce, separation, paternity, or child support. The court may grant less or more support if the evidence shows that the needs of the dependents require a different level of support.

All orders granting or modifying child support (including agreed orders) shall contain the court’s determination of the payor’s income, recite the amount of support required under the guidelines, and recite whether the court deviated from the Family Support Chart. If the order varies from the guidelines, it shall include a justification of why the order varies as may be permitted under Section V hereinafter. It shall be sufficient in a particular case to rebut the presumption that the amount of child support calculated pursuant to the Family Support Chart is correct, if the court enters in the case a specific written finding within the Order that the amount so calculated, after consideration of all relevant factors, including the best interests of the child, is unjust or inappropriate.

SECTION II. DEFINITION OF INCOME.

Income means any form of payment, periodic or otherwise, due to an individual, regardless of source, including wages, salaries, commissions, bonuses, workers’ compensation, disability, payments pursuant to a pension or retirement program, and interest less proper deductions for:

1. Federal and state income tax;
2. Withholding for Social Security (FICA), Medicare, and railroad retirement;
3. Medical insurance paid for dependent children; and
4. Presently paid support for other dependents by court order.

SECTION III. CALCULATION OF SUPPORT.

a. Basic Considerations.

The most recent revision of the family support charts is based on the weekly and monthly income of the payor parent as defined in Section II.

For purposes of computing child support payments, a month consists of 4.334 weeks. Biweekly means a payor is paid once every two weeks or 26 times during a calendar year. Bimonthly means a payor is paid twice a month or 24 times during a calendar year.

Use the lower figure on the chart for income to determine support. Do not interpolate (i.e., use the $200.00 amount for all income pay between $200.00 and $210.00 per week.)

The amount paid to the Clerk of the Court or to the Arkansas Clearinghouse for administrative costs pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 9-12-312(e)(l)(A), § 9-10-109(b)(l)(A), and § 9-14-804(b) is not to be included as support.

b. Income Which Exceeds Chart.

When the payor’s income exceeds that shown on the chart, use the following percentages of the payor’s weekly or monthly income as defined in SECTION II to set and establish a sum certain dollar amount of support:

One dependent: 15%
Two dependents: 21%
Three dependents: 25%
Four dependents: 28%
Five dependents: 30%
Six dependents: 32%
c. Nonsalaried Payors.

For Social Security Disability recipients, the court should consider the amount of any separate awards made to the disability recipient’s spouse and children on account of the payor’s disability.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ceola v. Burnham
139 S.W.3d 150 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2003)
Davis v. Davis
84 S.W.3d 447 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
347 Ark. 1064, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-administrative-order-number-10-ark-2002.