In re Administrative Order No. 1-MD-2003

895 A.2d 526
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 29, 2006·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. It is further hereby ordered that the parties brief the following additional issues:

(1) Whether the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County had jurisdiction over this matter.

(2) Whether the Commonwealth Court had appellate jurisdiction over this matter.

(3) Whether jurisdiction in this matter lies in the Commonwealth Court’s original jurisdiction or in this Court’s original jurisdiction by way of a petition for writ of prohibition.

Inasmuch as this matter involves a challenge to the lawfulness of an Administrative Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County, the Administrative Office of the Pennsylvania Courts is directed to provide legal services to the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County and to submit a brief on its behalf in this appeal.

[527]*527Justice BALDWIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Administrative Order No. 1-MD-2003, 895 A.2d 526 (Pa. 2006).

895 A.2d 526 (In re Administrative Order No. 1-MD-2003) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Administrative Order No. 1-Md-2003
936 A.2d 1 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2007)
Troutman v. Court of Common Pleas of Berks County
936 A.2d 1 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2007)