In Re: Adams

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re: Adams. Read the opinion of the Court — 420 F. App'x 228
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 1, 2011·No. 10-2262·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2262

In Re: DERRICK ALEXANDER ADAMS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:01-cr-00175-RLV-1)

Submitted: March 15, 2011 Decided: April 1, 2011

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derrick Alexander Adams, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Derrick Alexander Adams petitions for a writ of

mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting

on his “Motion to Clarify and/or for Amend Mistake in Judgment.”

He seeks an order from this court directing the district court

to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that

the district court dismissed the motion on February 2, 2011.

Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant

leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: Adams, (4th Cir. 2011).

In Re: Adams (In Re: Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.