In Re: Adams
This text of In Re: Adams (In Re: Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2262
In Re: DERRICK ALEXANDER ADAMS,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:01-cr-00175-RLV-1)
Submitted: March 15, 2011 Decided: April 1, 2011
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derrick Alexander Adams, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Derrick Alexander Adams petitions for a writ of
mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting
on his “Motion to Clarify and/or for Amend Mistake in Judgment.”
He seeks an order from this court directing the district court
to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that
the district court dismissed the motion on February 2, 2011.
Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Adams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-adams-ca4-2011.