In re A. W.
353 A.2d 686
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided January 30, 1976·No. No. 10397·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinions
ORDER
This interlocutory appeal came on for consideration on the record from the Superior Court, appellant’s memorandum of law and motion for summary reversal of the order of the trial court on appeal herein and the court heard argument of counsel. Upon consideration thereof, it is
Ordered that appellant’s motion be denied, and it is
Further ordered, there being no showing of an abuse of discretion by the trial judge, that the order on appeal herein be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re A. W., 353 A.2d 686 (D.C. 1976).
353 A.2d 686 (In re A. W.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Applewhite v. United States
614 A.2d 888 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1992)
Harris v. United States
612 A.2d 198 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1992)
Roper v. United States
564 A.2d 726 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1989)
Keitt v. United States
450 A.2d 461 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1982)
Colter v. United States
392 A.2d 994 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1978)
In the Matter of Aw
353 A.2d 686 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1976)