In re A. W.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In re A. W.

353 A.2d 686

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 30, 1976

DocketNo. 10397

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 353 A.2d 686 (In re A. W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re A. W., 353 A.2d 686 (D.C. 1976).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This interlocutory appeal came on for consideration on the record from the Superior Court, appellant’s memorandum of law and motion for summary reversal of the order of the trial court on appeal herein and the court heard argument of counsel. Upon consideration thereof, it is

Ordered that appellant’s motion be denied, and it is

Further ordered, there being no showing of an abuse of discretion by the trial judge, that the order on appeal herein be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This interlocutory appeal came on for consideration on the record from the Superior Court, appellant’s memorandum of law and motion for summary reversal of the order of the trial court on appeal herein and the court heard argument of counsel. Upon consideration thereof, it is

Ordered that appellant’s motion be denied, and it is

Further ordered, there being no showing of an abuse of discretion by the trial judge, that the order on appeal herein be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

353 A.2d 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-a-w-dc-1976.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack