Imperial Land Co. v. Imperial Irr. Dist.
This text of 161 P. 119 (Imperial Land Co. v. Imperial Irr. Dist.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal by defendants from an order granting an injunction pendente Ute. The injunction restrained the enforcement of an assessment levied by the board of directors of the Imperial Irrigation District. The trial of the action resulted in a judgment in favor of the defendants, and we have this day filed an opinion affirming such judgment. (Imperial Land Co. v. Imperial Irr. Dist., ante, p. 668, [161 Pac. 116].)
The judgment on the merits, which now becomes final, ended the life of the temporary injunction. The defendants have, accordingly, secured every substantial benefit which they could obtain by a reversal of the order which they seek to review by the present appeal. The rights of the parties would not be affected in any way by either an affirmance or a reversal of such order. In this state of facts, the questions presented are merely moot or academic, and the court will not exercise its appellate jurisdiction for their decision. (Foster v. Smith, 115 Cal. 611, [47 Pac. 591]; Bradley v. Voorsanger, 143 Cal. 214, [76 Pac. 1031].)
The appeal is dismissed.
Shaw, J., and Lawlor, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
161 P. 119, 173 Cal. 674, 1916 Cal. LEXIS 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/imperial-land-co-v-imperial-irr-dist-cal-1916.