San Diego Realty Co. v. Cornell
90 P. 549, 151 Cal. 200
Opinion
This case is in all respects like Couts v. Cornell,
The judgment in this case must be reversed, with directions to the trial court to permit a proper amendment to plaintiff's complaint if plaintiff should be so advised.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
San Diego Realty Co. v. Cornell, 90 P. 549, 151 Cal. 200 (Cal. 1907).
90 P. 549 (San Diego Realty Co. v. Cornell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc.
3 P.3d 286 (California Supreme Court, 2000)
People v. Stritzinger
668 P.2d 738 (California Supreme Court, 1983)
People v. Municipal Court (Runyan)
574 P.2d 425 (California Supreme Court, 1978)
People v. Williams
506 P.2d 998 (California Supreme Court, 1973)
People v. Valdez
187 P.2d 74 (California Court of Appeal, 1947)
People v. Dunn
177 P.2d 553 (California Supreme Court, 1947)
People v. Brown
256 P. 569 (California Court of Appeal, 1927)
People v. Niino
190 P. 626 (California Supreme Court, 1920)
People v. Wilson
146 P. 1048 (California Court of Appeal, 1915)
People v. Loper
112 P. 720 (California Supreme Court, 1910)
Henderson v. Cohen
102 P. 826 (California Court of Appeal, 1909)