San Diego Realty Co. v. Cornell

90 P. 549, 151 Cal. 200
California Supreme Court·Decided May 13, 1907·No. L.A. No. 1822.·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

This case is in all respects like Couts v. Cornell, 147 Cal. 560, [109 Am. St. Rep. 168, 82 P. 194]. There was no offer or tender of the amount of taxes justly due. It differs in this respect from the cases numbered L.A. 1805, ante, p. 197, and L.A. 1709, 150 Cal. 637, [89 P. 603], and the other cases decided upon their authority.

The judgment in this case must be reversed, with directions to the trial court to permit a proper amendment to plaintiff's complaint if plaintiff should be so advised.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

San Diego Realty Co. v. Cornell, 90 P. 549, 151 Cal. 200 (Cal. 1907).

90 P. 549 (San Diego Realty Co. v. Cornell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc.
3 P.3d 286 (California Supreme Court, 2000)
People v. Stritzinger
668 P.2d 738 (California Supreme Court, 1983)
People v. Municipal Court (Runyan)
574 P.2d 425 (California Supreme Court, 1978)
People v. Williams
506 P.2d 998 (California Supreme Court, 1973)
People v. Valdez
187 P.2d 74 (California Court of Appeal, 1947)
People v. Dunn
177 P.2d 553 (California Supreme Court, 1947)
People v. Brown
256 P. 569 (California Court of Appeal, 1927)
People v. Niino
190 P. 626 (California Supreme Court, 1920)
People v. Wilson
146 P. 1048 (California Court of Appeal, 1915)
People v. Loper
112 P. 720 (California Supreme Court, 1910)
Henderson v. Cohen
102 P. 826 (California Court of Appeal, 1909)