Illinois v. Gray

435 U.S. 1013, 98 S. Ct. 1887
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 1, 1978·No. No. 77-943·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Sup. Ct. Ill. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied, it appearing that the judgment below rests on an adequate state ground. Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall would deny petition without explanation.

Mr. Justice Stevens.

The Court’s occasional practice of explaining its denials of certiorari, see, e. g., Michigan v. Allensworth, ante, p. 933; Illinois v. Pendleton, ante, p. 956; Illinois v. Garlick, 434 U. S. 988 (1977), is, I believe, inconsistent with the rule that such denials have no precedential value. Since I regard that rule as an important aspect of our practice, I do not join the Court’s explanation in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Illinois v. Gray, 435 U.S. 1013, 98 S. Ct. 1887 (1978).

435 U.S. 1013 (Illinois v. Gray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Decker
664 A.2d 1028 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
Commonwealth v. Warrick
497 A.2d 259 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)
Commonwealth v. Allen
469 A.2d 1063 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)
United States v. Haggerty
528 F. Supp. 1286 (D. Colorado, 1981)