Illinois v. Gates Et Ux.

459 U.S. 1028, 103 S. Ct. 436, 74 L. Ed. 2d 595, 51 U.S.L.W. 3415, 1982 U.S. LEXIS 4445
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 29, 1982·No. 81-430·Published·Cited by 21 cases

Opinions

Sup. Ct. Ill. [Certiorari granted, 454 U. S. 1140.] Case restored to calendar for reargument. In addition to the question presented in the petition for certiorari and previously argued here, the parties are requested to address the question whether the rule requiring the exclusion at a criminal trial of evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643 (1961); Weeks v. United States, 232 U. S. 383 (1914), should to any extent be modified, so as, for example, not to require the exclusion of evidence obtained in the reasonable belief that the search and seizure at issue was consistent with the Fourth Amendment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Illinois v. Gates Et Ux., 459 U.S. 1028, 103 S. Ct. 436, 74 L. Ed. 2d 595, 51 U.S.L.W. 3415, 1982 U.S. LEXIS 4445 (1982).

459 U.S. 1028 (Illinois v. Gates Et Ux.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Gutierrez
819 P.2d 1332 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1991)
Patterson v. McLean Credit Union
485 U.S. 617 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Batson v. Kentucky
476 U.S. 79 (Supreme Court, 1986)
New Jersey v. T. L. O.
469 U.S. 325 (Supreme Court, 1985)
Commonwealth v. Chandler
458 A.2d 204 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
Illinois v. Gates
462 U.S. 213 (Supreme Court, 1983)
United States v. Travisano
560 F. Supp. 627 (D. Connecticut, 1983)
People v. Quintero
657 P.2d 948 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1983)
State v. Rayes
424 So. 2d 260 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1982)
Illinois v. Gates Et Ux.
459 U.S. 1028 (Supreme Court, 1982)