Illinois v. Gates Et Ux.

Supreme Court

Illinois v. Gates Et Ux.

459 U.S. 1028, 103 S. Ct. 436, 74 L. Ed. 2d 595, 51 U.S.L.W. 3415, 1982 U.S. LEXIS 4445

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 29, 1982

Docket81-430

StatusPublished

Cited by21 cases

This text of 459 U.S. 1028 (Illinois v. Gates Et Ux.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Illinois v. Gates Et Ux., 459 U.S. 1028, 103 S. Ct. 436, 74 L. Ed. 2d 595, 51 U.S.L.W. 3415, 1982 U.S. LEXIS 4445 (1982).

Pincite

Opinions

Sup. Ct. Ill. [Certiorari granted, 454 U. S. 1140.] Case restored to calendar for reargument. In addition to the question presented in the petition for certiorari and previously argued here, the parties are requested to address the question whether the rule requiring the exclusion at a criminal trial of evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643 (1961); Weeks v. United States, 232 U. S. 383 (1914), should to any extent be modified, so as, for example, not to require the exclusion of evidence obtained in the reasonable belief that the search and seizure at issue was consistent with the Fourth Amendment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sup. Ct. Ill. [Certiorari granted, 454 U. S. 1140.] Case restored to calendar for reargument. In addition to the question presented in the petition for certiorari and previously argued here, the parties are requested to address the question whether the rule requiring the exclusion at a criminal trial of evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643 (1961); Weeks v. United States, 232 U. S. 383 (1914), should to any extent be modified, so as, for example, not to require the exclusion of evidence obtained in the reasonable belief that the search and seizure at issue was consistent with the Fourth Amendment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

459 U.S. 1028, 103 S. Ct. 436, 74 L. Ed. 2d 595, 51 U.S.L.W. 3415, 1982 U.S. LEXIS 4445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/illinois-v-gates-et-ux-scotus-1982.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack