Iliya v. United States Marshalls Service

• Court: District Court, N.D. California
• Decided: January 22, 2025
• Docket: 3:24-cv-03720
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 DAUDA ILIYA, Case No. 24-cv-03720-TSH 7 Plaintiff, g y. SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 9 UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, 10 Defendant. 11 12 On December 20, 2024, the Court granted Defendant United States Marshals Service’s 5 13. || motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil S 14 || Procedure 12(b)(1) and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Rule 3 15 12(b)(6). ECF No. 23. Although the Court granted leave to amend by January 21, 2025, Plaintiff 16 || Dauda Ilya has failed to respond. 5 17 The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte “to achieve the 5 18 orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.” Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-33 19 (1962). Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff Dauda Iliya to show cause why this case 0 should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court deadlines. Plaintiff shall file a declaration by February 5, 2025. Notice is hereby provided that failure to file a written response will be deemed an admission that you do not intend to prosecute, and this case

will likely be dismissed. Thus, it is imperative the Court receive a written response by the

54 deadline above.

35 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 22, 2025 □ 27 THOMAS S. HIXSON 2 28 United States Magistrate Judge