Iglesias v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2336
LOURDES IGLESIAS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P.,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00008-MSD-FBS)
Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 26, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lourdes Iglesias, Appellant Pro Se. Lindsey Hager McGinnis, LITTLER MENDELSON, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Lourdes Iglesias appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss her claims against it.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Iglesias
v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., No. 2:09-cv-00008-MSD-FBS (E.D.
Va. Oct. 26, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Iglesias v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (Iglesias v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.