Iglesias v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.

Fourth Circuit

Iglesias v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.

375 F. App'x 364

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 26, 2010·No. No. 09-2336·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lourdes Iglesias appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss her claims against it. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Iglesias v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., No. 2:09-cv-00008-MSD-FBS (E.D.Va. Oct. 26, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lourdes Iglesias appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss her claims against it. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Iglesias v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., No. 2:09-cv-00008-MSD-FBS (E.D.Va. Oct. 26, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Iglesias v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., 375 F. App'x 364 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

375 F. App'x 364 (Iglesias v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.