IDY Corp. v. Engels

District Court of Appeal of Florida

IDY Corp. v. Engels

445 So. 2d 1076, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11919

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 21, 1984

DocketNo. 83-329

StatusPublished

This text of 445 So. 2d 1076 (IDY Corp. v. Engels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

IDY Corp. v. Engels, 445 So. 2d 1076, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11919 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal taken by IDY Corporation d/b/a Crazy Horse Saloon, from a final judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict in favor of appellee, Dirk Engels, and an order denying appellant’s motion for a new trial. This appeal followed.

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying the motion for new trial because of the accumulative prejudice of questions posed by plaintiff’s counsel.

We have carefully considered appellant’s contention in the light of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel and have concluded that no reversible error has been shown. See Castellanos v. Hialeah-Miami Springs First State Bank, 330 So.2d 100 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 341 So.2d 1080 (Fla.1976); Byrd v. Felder, 197 So.2d 554 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 201 So.2d 894 (Fla.1967).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI