Earl Hollis, Inc. v. Fraser Mortgage Co.
This text of 403 So. 2d 1038 (Earl Hollis, Inc. v. Fraser Mortgage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
While the final argument of defendant’s counsel was egregiously improper, we find that the plaintiff specifically waived the right to a mistrial on that ground below and therefore may not insist upon the issue on appeal. Diaz v. Rodriguez, 384 So.2d 906 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); 3 Fla.Jur.2d Appellate Review § 292 (1978); see State v, Cumbie, 380 So.2d 1031 (Fla.1980). The other points raised present no error.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
403 So. 2d 1038, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earl-hollis-inc-v-fraser-mortgage-co-fladistctapp-1981.