Earl Hollis, Inc. v. Fraser Mortgage Co.

403 So. 2d 1038, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20914
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 26, 1981
DocketNo. 80-1639
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 403 So. 2d 1038 (Earl Hollis, Inc. v. Fraser Mortgage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Earl Hollis, Inc. v. Fraser Mortgage Co., 403 So. 2d 1038, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20914 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

While the final argument of defendant’s counsel was egregiously improper, we find that the plaintiff specifically waived the right to a mistrial on that ground below and therefore may not insist upon the issue on appeal. Diaz v. Rodriguez, 384 So.2d 906 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); 3 Fla.Jur.2d Appellate Review § 292 (1978); see State v, Cumbie, 380 So.2d 1031 (Fla.1980). The other points raised present no error.

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN, J., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur. LETTS, C. J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ed Ricke & Sons v. Green by and Through Swan
468 So. 2d 908 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
IDY Corp. v. Engels
445 So. 2d 1076 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Green v. Ed Ricke and Sons, Inc.
438 So. 2d 25 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Nable v. Estate of Godfrey
403 So. 2d 1038 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
403 So. 2d 1038, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earl-hollis-inc-v-fraser-mortgage-co-fladistctapp-1981.