Idso v. Idso

2024 ND 116
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedJune 6, 2024
DocketNo. 20230387
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2024 ND 116 (Idso v. Idso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Idso v. Idso, 2024 ND 116 (N.D. 2024).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2024 ND 116

Nancy Lee Idso, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Dale John Idso, Jr., Defendant and Appellant

No. 20230387

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable John C. Irby, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Kimberlie M. Larson, West Fargo, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Dale J. Idso, Jr., self-represented, Mapleton, ND, defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. Idso v. Idso No. 20230387

[¶1] Dale Idso appeals from an order finding him in contempt of court. Nancy Idso argues this appeal is frivolous and requests attorney’s fees and double costs.

[¶2] On appeal, Dale Idso argues that the marriage between himself and Nancy Idso was invalid and that the district court erred in its property distribution. Dale Idso’s brief does not meet the minimum requirements in N.D.R.App.P. 28, nor did he present any argument regarding how the court abused its discretion in making a contempt determination. Under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(8), this Court may summarily affirm a judgment if the appellant’s brief fails to comply with N.D.R.App.P. 28.

[¶3] After a review of the record, we are satisfied there is evidence to support the court’s property distribution, we are not left with a definite and firm conviction a mistake has been made, and we conclude the findings and distributions were not clearly erroneous.

[¶4] We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (8).

[¶5] Nancy Idso requests attorney’s fees and double costs for defending this frivolous appeal. Under N.D.R.App.P. 38, the Court “may award just damages and single or double costs, including reasonable attorney’s fees,” if it determines an appeal is frivolous. The two issues Dale Idso raised on appeal were not raised in the district court on Nancy Idso’s motion for contempt of court. Having concluded this appeal is frivolous, we award Nancy Idso double costs and attorney’s fees in the amount of $1,625.00.

[¶6] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Idso v. Idso
2024 ND 116 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 ND 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/idso-v-idso-nd-2024.