Identification Devices, Inc. v. United States
314 U.S. 615, 62 S. Ct. 63, 86 L. Ed. 495, 51 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 546, 1941 U.S. LEXIS 1294
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 13, 1941
DocketNo. 108
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases
This text of 314 U.S. 615 (Identification Devices, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Identification Devices, Inc. v. United States, 314 U.S. 615, 62 S. Ct. 63, 86 L. Ed. 495, 51 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 546, 1941 U.S. LEXIS 1294 (1941).
Opinion
The motion to proceed on typewritten papers is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Burlodge Ltd. v. Standex International Corp.
257 F.R.D. 12 (District of Columbia, 2009)
Robishaw Engineering, Inc. v. United States
891 F. Supp. 1134 (E.D. Virginia, 1995)
Serra v. United States General Services Administration
667 F. Supp. 1042 (S.D. New York, 1987)
James G. Wheatley v. Elbert Gladden
660 F.2d 1024 (Fourth Circuit, 1981)
Calloway v. United States
431 F. Supp. 1111 (E.D. Oklahoma, 1977)
Martinez v. Star Fish and Oyster Co., Inc.
386 F. Supp. 560 (S.D. Alabama, 1974)
United States v. Harris
381 F. Supp. 1095 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1974)
United States v. Kenneth Dale Hudson
479 F.2d 251 (Ninth Circuit, 1973)
David Stevens v. Seacoast Company, Inc. And M/v Elena S
414 F.2d 1032 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc.
261 F. Supp. 691 (S.D. New York, 1966)
Harrison Construction Co. v. Ohio Turnpike Commission
316 F.2d 174 (Sixth Circuit, 1963)
Harrison Construction Company v. Ohio Turnpike Commission, Harrison Construction Company, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee v. Ohio Turnpike Commission, Defendant-Cross-Appellant
316 F.2d 174 (Sixth Circuit, 1963)
J. & G. DEVELOPMENT COMPANY v. All-Tronics, Inc.
198 F. Supp. 392 (E.D. New York, 1961)
United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corporation
187 F. Supp. 545 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1960)
The Canada Life Assurance Company, a Corporation v. Charlotte S. Houston
241 F.2d 523 (Ninth Circuit, 1957)
Application of Woodling
210 F.2d 955 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1954)
Du Bose v. Drummond
95 A.2d 57 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1953)
Bautista v. Jones
155 P.2d 343 (California Supreme Court, 1944)
Timken-Detroit Axle Co. v. Alma Motor Co.
144 F.2d 714 (Third Circuit, 1944)
International Carbonic Engineering Co. v. Natural Carbonic Products, Inc.
57 F. Supp. 248 (S.D. California, 1944)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
314 U.S. 615, 62 S. Ct. 63, 86 L. Ed. 495, 51 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 546, 1941 U.S. LEXIS 1294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/identification-devices-inc-v-united-states-scotus-1941.