Ibis Construction Co. v. Sinclair

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ibis Construction Co. v. Sinclair

406 So. 2d 510, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21539

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 3, 1981·No. No. 81-499·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the finding that the appellant was guilty of civil contempt by violating agreed court orders is completely supported by the evidence, see, Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); South Dade Farms, Inc. v. Peters, 88 So.2d 891 (Fla.1956); and that the assessment of a compensatory fine which included the appellees’ attorney’s fees was justified by the circumstances and the applicable law. South Dade Farms, Inc. v. Peters, supra; National Exterminators, Inc. v. Truly Nolen, Inc., 86 So.2d 816 (Fla.1956); Gregory v. Mucho K, Inc., 438 F.Supp. 1117 (S.D.Fla.1977), rev’d on other grounds, 578 F.2d 1156 (5th Cir. 1978).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the finding that the appellant was guilty of civil contempt by violating agreed court orders is completely supported by the evidence, see, Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); South Dade Farms, Inc. v. Peters, 88 So.2d 891 (Fla.1956); and that the assessment of a compensatory fine which included the appellees’ attorney’s fees was justified by the circumstances and the applicable law. South Dade Farms, Inc. v. Peters, supra; National Exterminators, Inc. v. Truly Nolen, Inc., 86 So.2d 816 (Fla.1956); Gregory v. Mucho K, Inc., 438 F.Supp. 1117 (S.D.Fla.1977), rev’d on other grounds, 578 F.2d 1156 (5th Cir. 1978).

Affirmed.

Ibis Construction Co. v. Sinclair, 406 So. 2d 510, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21539 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

406 So. 2d 510 (Ibis Construction Co. v. Sinclair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related