Ibis Construction Co. v. Sinclair

406 So. 2d 510, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21539
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 3, 1981
DocketNo. 81-499
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 406 So. 2d 510 (Ibis Construction Co. v. Sinclair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ibis Construction Co. v. Sinclair, 406 So. 2d 510, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21539 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the finding that the appellant was guilty of civil contempt by violating agreed court orders is completely supported by the evidence, see, Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); South Dade Farms, Inc. v. Peters, 88 So.2d 891 (Fla.1956); and that the assessment of a compensatory fine which included the appellees’ attorney’s fees was justified by the circumstances and the applicable law. South Dade Farms, Inc. v. Peters, supra; National Exterminators, Inc. v. Truly Nolen, Inc., 86 So.2d 816 (Fla.1956); Gregory v. Mucho K, Inc., 438 F.Supp. 1117 (S.D.Fla.1977), rev’d on other grounds, 578 F.2d 1156 (5th Cir. 1978).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daniel Kaplan v. Kenneth B. Schurr
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025
Lamb v. Fowler
574 So. 2d 262 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Pollock v. T & M Investments, Inc.
455 So. 2d 573 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
406 So. 2d 510, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ibis-construction-co-v-sinclair-fladistctapp-1981.