Hyundai Merchant Marine Co. v. United States

75 F.3d 134, 1996 WL 32965
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJanuary 26, 1996
DocketNo. 959, Docket 95-6178
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 75 F.3d 134 (Hyundai Merchant Marine Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hyundai Merchant Marine Co. v. United States, 75 F.3d 134, 1996 WL 32965 (2d Cir. 1996).

Opinion

JON O. NEWMAN, Chief Judge:

This is an appeal from the June 6, 1995, judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Peter K. Leisure, Judge), dismissing a tort claim against the United States as barred by 10 U.S.C. § 2798 (1994). Hyundai Merchant Marine Co. v. United States, 888 F.Supp. 543 (S.D.N.Y. 1995). The appeal presents essentially two issues: (a) whether a suit based on the failure of the Defense Mapping Agency to up[135]*135date a navigational chart is within the scope of section 2798, which provides that “[n]o civil action may be brought against the United States on the basis of the content of a navigational aid prepared or disseminated by the Defense Mapping Agency,” and (b) if so, whether the application of section 2798 in this case denies the appellants any constitutional rights.

The District Court answered the first question in the affirmative and the second question in the negative, and therefore dismissed the suit. We affirm on the basis of Judge Leisure’s comprehensive and well-reasoned opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 F.3d 134, 1996 WL 32965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyundai-merchant-marine-co-v-united-states-ca2-1996.