Hyppolite v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hyppolite v. State

259 So. 3d 95

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 4, 2018·No. CASE NO.: 2D18-4198·Published

Opinion

As it appears that the proceedings in the circuit court relative to the petitioner's motion for postconviction relief are progressing, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Cf. Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). This denial is without prejudice to the petitioner to file a new petition for writ of mandamus if the postconviction court has not entered a final order on the motion within 90 days of the date of this order, provided that the petitioner is unrepresented by counsel in the postconviction proceeding.

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

As it appears that the proceedings in the circuit court relative to the petitioner's motion for postconviction relief are progressing, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Cf. Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). This denial is without prejudice to the petitioner to file a new petition for writ of mandamus if the postconviction court has not entered a final order on the motion within 90 days of the date of this order, provided that the petitioner is unrepresented by counsel in the postconviction proceeding.

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Hyppolite v. State, 259 So. 3d 95 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

259 So. 3d 95 (Hyppolite v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related