Hynes v. Pratt

338 U.S. 908, 70 S. Ct. 340
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 9, 1950
DocketNo. 262, Misc.
StatusPublished

This text of 338 U.S. 908 (Hynes v. Pratt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hynes v. Pratt, 338 U.S. 908, 70 S. Ct. 340 (1950).

Opinion

The motion for leave to file petition for writ of [909]*909mandamus is denied. Ex parte Fahey, 332 U. S. 258.

Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Vanech, Roger P. Marquis and S. Billingsley Hill for petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Fahey
332 U.S. 258 (Supreme Court, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
338 U.S. 908, 70 S. Ct. 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hynes-v-pratt-scotus-1950.