Hyatt v. Roach

52 How. Pr. 115, 1 Abb. N. Cas. 125
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1876
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 52 How. Pr. 115 (Hyatt v. Roach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hyatt v. Roach, 52 How. Pr. 115, 1 Abb. N. Cas. 125 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1876).

Opinion

Lawrence, J.

— The action is brought to recover a penalty for neglect to file the annual report under the twelfth section [116]*116of chapter forty (Lams of 1848). It is not upon contract (Merchants' Bank agt. Bliss, 35 N. Y., 412). The penalty imposed by that section is, that upon failure to file such report the trustees of the company shall, jointly and severally, be liable for all the debts of the company then existing, &c.

The character of the action is determined by the complaint (Welsh agt. Darragh, 52 N. Y., 590). An inspection of the complaint shows that it is not upon contract, but is brought to enforce a penal obligation of the defendant, under the statute, in his capacity as trustee.

Motion for reference denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wallace & Sons v. Walsh
3 Silv. Ct. App. 212 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
People v. Wood
7 N.Y.S. 712 (New York Supreme Court, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 How. Pr. 115, 1 Abb. N. Cas. 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyatt-v-roach-nysupct-1876.