Hutto v. State
218 So. 3d 507, 2017 WL 2130234, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6930
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hutto v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7745 →
Opinion
In response to this court’s show cause order, the state conceded that the trial court first failed to issue an order pursu[508]*508ant to State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999), prior to barring appellant from filing any pro se filings without the signature of a member of The Florida Bar. We therefore reverse and remand the order on appeal because the lower court must first comply with Spencer before prohibiting pro se filings.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hutto v. State, 218 So. 3d 507, 2017 WL 2130234, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6930 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).
218 So. 3d 507 (Hutto v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)