Hutto v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hutto v. State

190 So. 3d 698, 2016 WL 2855908, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7450

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 16, 2016

DocketNo. 1D16-38

StatusPublished

This text of 190 So. 3d 698 (Hutto v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hutto v. State, 190 So. 3d 698, 2016 WL 2855908, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7450 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal- is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. . See Linhares v. State, 36 So.3d 832, 833 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (“Be-' cause the notice of appeal was filed more than 30 days after rendition of the order, this Court is without appellate jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b). A motion to mitigate under rule 3.800(c) is' discretionary with the court arfd is itself not appeal-able.”).'

ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS AND RAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal- is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. . See Linhares v. State, 36 So.3d 832, 833 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (“Be-' cause the notice of appeal was filed more than 30 days after rendition of the order, this Court is without appellate jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b). A motion to mitigate under rule 3.800(c) is' discretionary with the court arfd is itself not appeal-able.”).'

ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS AND RAY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 So. 3d 698, 2016 WL 2855908, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutto-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack