Hutto v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hutto v. State

190 So. 3d 698, 2016 WL 2855908, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7450

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hutto v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7745 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 16, 2016·No. No. 1D16-38·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal- is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. . See Linhares v. State, 36 So.3d 832, 833 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (“Be-' cause the notice of appeal was filed more than 30 days after rendition of the order, this Court is without appellate jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b). A motion to mitigate under rule 3.800(c) is' discretionary with the court arfd is itself not appeal-able.”).'

ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS AND RAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal- is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. . See Linhares v. State, 36 So.3d 832, 833 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (“Be-' cause the notice of appeal was filed more than 30 days after rendition of the order, this Court is without appellate jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b). A motion to mitigate under rule 3.800(c) is' discretionary with the court arfd is itself not appeal-able.”).'

ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS AND RAY, JJ., concur.

Hutto v. State, 190 So. 3d 698, 2016 WL 2855908, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7450 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

190 So. 3d 698 (Hutto v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related