Hutchins v. Watkins

100 S.E. 644, 24 Ga. App. 207, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 505
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 9, 1919·No. 10313·Published

Opinion

Bloodwobth, J.

“The motion for new trial in this case contained the usual general grounds only, and there being evidence to sustain the verdict, this court cannot disturb the finding of the jury by overruling the refusal of the trial judge to grant a new trial upon the ground that the verdict was contrary to evidence or without evidence to support it. Davis v. Kirkland, 1 Ga. App. 5 (58 S. E. 209); Stricklin v. Crawley, 1 Ga. App. 139 (58 S. E. 215); Charles v. Brooker, 1 Ga. App. 219 (58 S. E. 218); Daughtry v. Savannah & Ry. Co., 1 Ga. App. 393 (58 S. E. 230); Edge v. Thomas, 9 Ga. App. 559 (71 S. E. 875).” McCarty v. Keys, 19 Ga. App. 494 (91 S. E. 875); Bradham v. State, 21 Ga. App. 510 (94 S. E. 618), and cases cited.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hutchins v. Watkins, 100 S.E. 644, 24 Ga. App. 207, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 505 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

100 S.E. 644 (Hutchins v. Watkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. Kirkland
58 S.E. 209 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Stricklin & Co. v. Crawley
58 S.E. 215 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Charles v. Brooker
58 S.E. 218 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Daughtry v. Savannah & Statesboro Railway Co.
58 S.E. 230 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Edge v. Thomas
71 S.E. 875 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
McCarty v. Keys
91 S.E. 875 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Bradham v. State
94 S.E. 618 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)