Hutchins v. State

769 So. 2d 489, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13486, 2000 WL 1532804
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hutchins v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17209
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 18, 2000·No. No. 4D00-2696·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We review the order of the trial court summarily denying Dennis Hutchins’s motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, alleging his right to be resentenced under the 1994 sentencing guidelines.

The Supreme Court of Florida recently held that the operative window period in which to challenge the sentencing guide[490]*490line provisions amended by Chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, commenced on October 1, 1995, and ended on May 24, 1997. See Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924 (Fla.2000). As we did in Speed v. State, 764 So.2d 873 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), we agree with Judge Altenbernd’s analysis in Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), on the need to remand such cases for a recalculation of the defendant’s sentence under the 1994 guidelines scoresheet.

Accordingly, we reverse the order denying 3.850 relief and remand for reconsideration of whether sentencing is required pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000).

WARNER, C.J., STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hutchins v. State, 769 So. 2d 489, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13486, 2000 WL 1532804 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

769 So. 2d 489 (Hutchins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Speed v. State
764 So. 2d 873 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Trapp v. State
760 So. 2d 924 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Smith v. State
761 So. 2d 419 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)