Hutchins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hutchins v. State

795 So. 2d 1014, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12448, 2001 WL 1007230

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 5, 2001

DocketNo. 2D00-1456

StatusPublished

This text of 795 So. 2d 1014 (Hutchins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hutchins v. State, 795 So. 2d 1014, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12448, 2001 WL 1007230 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

A jury convicted Joseph C. Hutchins of possession of a firearm by a violent career criminal. He finds fault in the denial of his motion to recuse the judge who heard his pretrial motions, the denial of his motion to suppress his incul-patory statements to the arresting officers, and the sufficiency of the evidence to prove his guilt.- We reject the first contention without comment. The second issue was not preserved for appeal because Hutchins’s trial counsel failed to object when evidence of his statements was presented to the jury. See Routly v. State, 440 So.2d 1257, 1260 (Fla.1983). Finally, with those statements in evidence, the proof sufficed to support Hutchins’s conviction.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

A jury convicted Joseph C. Hutchins of possession of a firearm by a violent career criminal. He finds fault in the denial of his motion to recuse the judge who heard his pretrial motions, the denial of his motion to suppress his incul-patory statements to the arresting officers, and the sufficiency of the evidence to prove his guilt.- We reject the first contention without comment. The second issue was not preserved for appeal because Hutchins’s trial counsel failed to object when evidence of his statements was presented to the jury. See Routly v. State, 440 So.2d 1257, 1260 (Fla.1983). Finally, with those statements in evidence, the proof sufficed to support Hutchins’s conviction.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

795 So. 2d 1014, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12448, 2001 WL 1007230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutchins-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack