Huston v. Twin & City Creek Turn Pike Road Co.

45 Cal. 550
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1873
DocketNo. 3,448
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 45 Cal. 550 (Huston v. Twin & City Creek Turn Pike Road Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Huston v. Twin & City Creek Turn Pike Road Co., 45 Cal. 550 (Cal. 1873).

Opinion

By the Court, Niles, J.:

It sufficiently appears from the evidence that the injuries complainfed of were caused by the culpable negligence of the defendant in either the construction or maintenance of its road, and that there was no lack of due care upon the part of the drivers in the driving and management of the plaintiffs oxen at the time that the slide which occasioned the damage occurred. Upon the question whether the defect in the road was evidently of such a character that a prudent man in the exercise of ordinary care would not have attempted to pass over it, the testimony was substan[553]*553tially conflicting, and a finding in favor of the judgment will be implied.

Eo proof of damages was required, as no issue was made upon that point. A denial that the plaintiff has suffered damage in the exact sum claimed by him is insufficient. (Higgins v. Wortel, 18 Cal. 330.)

Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosado v. Ponce Railway & Light Co.
20 P.R. 528 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1914)
Johnson v. Vance
24 P. 862 (California Supreme Court, 1890)
Conway v. Clinton
1 Utah 215 (Utah Supreme Court, 1875)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 Cal. 550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huston-v-twin-city-creek-turn-pike-road-co-cal-1873.