Huston v. Roosa
42 Ind. 386
Opinion
This was an action by the appellee against the appellant and one Fitzgerald, to compel the surrender and cancellation of a promissory note, and there was final judgment for the plaintiff. Huston alone appeals and has assigned errors, without complying with section 551, 2 G. & H. 270. The appeal is for this cause dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Huston v. Roosa, 42 Ind. 386 (Ind. 1873).
42 Ind. 386 (Huston v. Roosa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Knight v. Wall
1 Wilson 564 (Indiana Super. Ct., 1874)