Huston v. Roosa
42 Ind. 386
This text of 42 Ind. 386 (Huston v. Roosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Huston v. Roosa, 42 Ind. 386 (Ind. 1873).
Opinion
This was an action by the appellee against the appellant and one Fitzgerald, to compel the surrender and cancellation of a promissory note, and there was final judgment for the plaintiff. Huston alone appeals and has assigned errors, without complying with section 551, 2 G. & H. 270. The appeal is for this cause dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Knight v. Wall
1 Wilson 564 (Indiana Super. Ct., 1874)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
42 Ind. 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huston-v-roosa-ind-1873.