Hurtt v. Woodland

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Hurtt v. Woodland

24 Md. 417, 1866 Md. LEXIS 24

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedJanuary 22, 1866

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 Md. 417 (Hurtt v. Woodland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hurtt v. Woodland, 24 Md. 417, 1866 Md. LEXIS 24 (Md. 1866).

Pincite

Opinion

Weisel, J.,

delivered the opinion of this Court.

The facts and questions being the same in this as in the preceding case, between the same parties, except that the action in this case was instituted to recover the value of the peach crop for the year 1860, the views and conclusions of the Court in that case also govern this. For the reasons therein assigned the Court below erred in its instructions to the jury on the prayers of the plaintiffs, and its judgment must therefore be reversed.

Judgment reversed and procedendo awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weisel, J.,

delivered the opinion of this Court.

The facts and questions being the same in this as in the preceding case, between the same parties, except that the action in this case was instituted to recover the value of the peach crop for the year 1860, the views and conclusions of the Court in that case also govern this. For the reasons therein assigned the Court below erred in its instructions to the jury on the prayers of the plaintiffs, and its judgment must therefore be reversed.

Judgment reversed and procedendo awarded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 Md. 417, 1866 Md. LEXIS 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurtt-v-woodland-md-1866.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack