Hurt v. Bailey Realtor Inc. LLC

District Court, E.D. Missouri·Decided February 24, 2020·No. 4:20-cv-00099·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION TYRONE HURT, ) Plaintiff, ) v. No. 4:20-CV-99 NAB BAILEY REALTOR INC. LLC, ) Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. ECF No. 10. The Court dismissed this action on January 28, 2020, for lack of proper venue, and denied plaintiff's motion to proceed in the district court in forma pauperis. See ECF Nos. 5, 6. Plaintiff, a resident of Washington D.C., filed this civil action against defendant “Bailey Realtor Inc. LLC,” stating that defendant is incorporated and has its principal place of business in Washington D.C. ECF No. 1 at 2-4. Plaintiff alleged no basis for venue being proper in this Court and the Court found that none of the venue requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) had been met. See ECF No. 5. The Court also noted that pro se plaintiff has a history of filing cases in districts where venue does not lie, and that plaintiff has been barred from proceeding in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and in the District Court for the District of Columbia. See id; Hurt v. Soc. Sec. Admin., 544 F.3d 308, 311 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (per curium); Hurt v. The Declaration of Indep., No. 07-0647 (D.D.C. Jan 9, 2009). The Court finds that the appeal of its January 28, 2020, dismissal of this matter is not taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A). Also, it is not apparent from plaintiff's notice of appeal that he seeks appellate review of any issue that is not frivolous. See

Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). As a result, the Court will deny the motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal of the Court’s January 28, 2020, dismissal of this action is not taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [ECF No. 10] is DENIED. Dated tris Ls of February, 2020. Fisrncia dL Uae RONNIE L. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hurt v. Bailey Realtor Inc. LLC, (E.D. Mo. 2020).

Hurt v. Bailey Realtor Inc. LLC (Hurt v. Bailey Realtor Inc. LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Hurt v. Social Security Administration
544 F.3d 308 (D.C. Circuit, 2008)