Hurlbut v. City of Chicago
56 N.E. 1134, 184 Ill. 455
Opinion
In these cases judgments were entered by the county court of Cook county confirming special assessments to pay for grading, paving and curbing with curb-stones certain streets in the city of Chicago. In each case the ordinance for the improvement is in all respects like the ordinance passed upon in Lusk v. City of Chicago, 176 Ill. 207. Upon the authority of that case the judgments are reversed and the causes remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hurlbut v. City of Chicago, 56 N.E. 1134, 184 Ill. 455 (Ill. 1900).
56 N.E. 1134 (Hurlbut v. City of Chicago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ayers v. City of Chicago
56 N.E. 1133 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1900)